Running SimpleCov produces 2 different coverage values (terminal/html)

[onebree]

While negligible, both types of generated coverage reports have different % values. After a closer look, LOC reported also differ.

From ./coverage/index.html

After running bundle exec rspec in terminal:
Coverage report generated for RSpec to ./coverage. 8023 / 14085 LOC (56.96%) covered.

The following Gist holds spec_helper.rb, .simplecov, and my environment
https://gist.github.com/onebree/99a048461f41713b9999

[bf4]

I'm not sure I understand the two ways you're running tests. One is bundle exec rspec and the other is?

In any case, in looking at your gist, I see you're requiring and starting SimpleCov multiple ways. That could account for the different results. You may want to look at and compare the json it generates in the coverage directory.

In your gist you have

# .simplecov
SimpleCov.start do
  load_profile 'rails' # load_adapter < 0.8
# spec/spec_helper.rb
require 'simplecov'

Spork.prefork do
  unless ENV['DRB']
    require 'simplecov'
    SimpleCov.start 'rails' do

Spork.each_run do
  if ENV['DRB']
    require 'simplecov'
    SimpleCov.start 'rails'

I see you've already looked at #340 Have you since resolved your issue?

[onebree]

Thank you for replying to my comment in #340. I will work on a SimpleCov profile next year (hahaha). I think this may solve my issue in #354.

What I meant was 2 tests was this:

1. Running bundle exec rspec in terminal produces a mini report/result after all specs are ran.
2. When I open the HTML report in my coverage directory, the numbers listed there are different than those from the terminal report.

I also decided along the way to not mix Spork and SimpleCov, but that's not totally relevant to this issue... Just wanted to update you.