Add cosign verify-bundle example #186
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit adds an example that uses cosign sign-blob with the --bundle option so that a bundle is generated. This bundle will then be used as an argument to verify-bundle, and it will be used to verify a blob. Signed-off-by: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
2 tasks
flavio
requested changes
Jan 12, 2023
Address PR review feedback. Signed-off-by: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
|
Thanks for the contribution and for having addressed the feedback I left during the PR review |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This commit adds an example that uses
cosign sign-blobwith the--bundleoption so that a bundle is generated. This bundle will then be used as an argument to verify-bundle, and it will be used to verify a blob.Release Note
NONE
Documentation
NONE
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bevenius daniel.bevenius@gmail.com
I realize that this example is very different from the verify example. I've tried to make the usage as simple as possible, but I realize that being new to the code base I might not have enough knowledge about how this could be improved. Hopefully others can provide feedback if there are better ways of doing this.