-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP]Refactor MulticlassMachine #5101
[WIP]Refactor MulticlassMachine #5101
Conversation
I guess this just has to be cleaned up a bit manually. And then can see if the compiler still throws errors, in which case there might be a class missing |
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ class SVM : public KernelMachine | |||
*/ | |||
SVM(float64_t C, std::shared_ptr<Kernel> k, std::shared_ptr<Labels> lab); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you still need this constructor?
/* changing the subset structure to use subset stacks. This might | ||
* have to be revised. Heiko Strathmann */ | ||
m_features->remove_subset(); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if these methods becomes noops can they just be removed? How are the subsets handled now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just add/remove subset to feature that will be passed in train_machine
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, makes sense to me :)
ed3e315
to
aa02ae7
Compare
aa02ae7
to
ef95d18
Compare
Fix by shogun-toolbox/shogun-libtooling#2