Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump coverage from 7.6.9 to 7.6.10 #204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 26, 2024

Bumps coverage from 7.6.9 to 7.6.10.

Changelog

Sourced from coverage's changelog.

Version 7.6.10 — 2024-12-26

  • Fix: some descriptions of missing branches in HTML and LCOV reports were incorrect when multi-line statements were involved (issue 1874_ and issue 1875_). These are now fixed.

  • Fix: Python 3.14 defers evaluation of annotations <pep649_>_ by moving them into separate code objects. That code is rarely executed, so coverage.py would mark them as missing, as reported in issue 1908_. Now they are ignored by coverage automatically.

  • Fixed an obscure and mysterious problem on PyPy 3.10 seemingly involving mocks, imports, and trace functions: issue 1902_. To be honest, I don't understand the problem or the solution, but git bisect helped find it, and now it's fixed.

  • Docs: re-wrote the :ref:subprocess page to put multiprocessing first and to highlight the correct use of :class:multiprocessing.Pool <python:multiprocessing.pool.Pool>.

.. _issue 1874: nedbat/coveragepy#1874 .. _issue 1875: nedbat/coveragepy#1875 .. _issue 1902: nedbat/coveragepy#1902 .. _issue 1908: nedbat/coveragepy#1908 .. _pep649: https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html#pep-649-deferred-evaluation-of-annotations

.. _changes_7-6-9:

Commits
  • f0dcf65 docs: sample HTML for 7.6.10
  • 0f26f35 docs: prep for 7.6.10
  • 81c5e43 docs: rewrite the subprocess page
  • 878410c chore: make doc_upgrade
  • f1d320d chore: make upgrade
  • 67f1440 debug: this condition is never true. really?
  • c85eaba fix: multi-line statements no longer confuse branch target descriptions. #187...
  • 73e58fa refactor: clarify the code that fixes with-statement exits
  • e16c9cc typo: backslask
  • 865fd7f chore: bump the action-dependencies group with 4 updates (#1909)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [coverage](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy) from 7.6.9 to 7.6.10.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/blob/master/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](nedbat/coveragepy@7.6.9...7.6.10)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: coverage
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2024 19:20
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code labels Dec 26, 2024
Copy link

🛡️ Bandit Scan Results Summary

We found 0 High, 0 Medium, and 0 Low severity issues.

Detailed Findings


Severity Issue File Line Confidence More Info Test ID

✨ About this Report

This report was generated by the official Bandit GitHub Action to ensure our codebase stays secure.

📕 What is Bandit?

Bandit is a tool designed to find common security issues in Python code. To learn more about how Bandit helps to keep Python code safe, visit the Bandit documentation.

👥 Community Support

Got questions or need help with Bandit Action?

  • Join our community on the Discord server.
  • Share tips, get advice, and collaborate on security best practices.

Copy link

@senzingdevops senzingdevops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated: approving this pull request because it includes a patch update

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge (squash) December 26, 2024 19:21
Copy link

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 944a8f9 into main Dec 26, 2024
65 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the dependabot/pip/coverage-7.6.10 branch December 26, 2024 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant