Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: [Snyk] Security upgrade com.sendgrid:java-http-client from 4.3.6 to 4.3.7 #694

Merged

Conversation

svcprodsec-sendgrid
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `maven` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHEHTTPCOMPONENTS-1048058
com.sendgrid:java-http-client:
4.3.6 -> 4.3.7
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

@shwetha-manvinkurke shwetha-manvinkurke merged commit 468db09 into main Aug 2, 2021
@shwetha-manvinkurke shwetha-manvinkurke deleted the snyk-fix-fcf61f7ea241115d20e1a06bd0e891ab branch August 2, 2021 16:11
@eshanholtz eshanholtz changed the title [Snyk] Security upgrade com.sendgrid:java-http-client from 4.3.6 to 4.3.7 chore: [Snyk] Security upgrade com.sendgrid:java-http-client from 4.3.6 to 4.3.7 Aug 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants