docs: update examples/awkward_example.ipynb

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Closes #120.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 85.71% // Head: 85.71% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (e5c5401) compared to base (3a0590d).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #174   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.71%   85.71%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         217      217           
  Branches       48       48           
=======================================
  Hits          186      186           
  Misses         27       27           
  Partials        4        4           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-3.10	85.25% <ø> (ø)
unittests-3.7	84.90% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Happy New Year @matthewfeickert!

This was low-hanging fruit. I would make a (legacy) release just after this, to then move to depending on awkward 2. Let me know what you think.

[matthewfeickert]

Happy New Year

Same to you! Hope 2023 is off to a good start. 🎉

This was low-hanging fruit. I would make a (legacy) release just after this, to then move to depending on awkward 2. Let me know what you think.

Sounds good. We had discussed doing a v0.5.0 release awhile back, but I had wanted to get PR #157 fixed and in before doing so. I'm not sure why it is failing at the moment and haven't made time to circle back to fix it. If you have any thoughts there that would be nice to knock out.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Sure, am on it ... :-)