Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rpm:packageBin reports "rpmVendor in Rpm is empty" despite a value being set #943

Closed
leifwickland opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@leifwickland
Copy link

leifwickland commented Feb 16, 2017

Beginning with 1.2.0-M5, attempting to rpm:packageBin always fails with the error:

`rpmVendor in Rpm` is empty

even if a value is set.

Example project to reproduce the problem:
https://github.com/leifwickland/native-bug

@leifwickland leifwickland changed the title Regression in 1.2.0-M5: rpm:packageBin always reports "rpmVendor in Rpm is empty" rpm:packageBin always reports "rpmVendor in Rpm is empty" Feb 16, 2017
@leifwickland leifwickland changed the title rpm:packageBin always reports "rpmVendor in Rpm is empty" rpm:packageBin reports "rpmVendor in Rpm is empty" despite a value being set Feb 16, 2017
@muuki88 muuki88 added the rpm label Feb 19, 2017
@muuki88
Copy link
Contributor

muuki88 commented Feb 19, 2017

Hi @leifwickland

Thanks for this well done bug report. The error you get is expected. There is a section in the release notes for this release.

All settings prefixed with rpm were moved out of the Rpm scope. This means that you should
remove the in Rpm configuration scope for settings and tasks prefixed with rpm.

This should fix your build.

@muuki88 muuki88 closed this as completed Feb 19, 2017
@leifwickland
Copy link
Author

leifwickland commented Feb 19, 2017 via email

@LeifW
Copy link

LeifW commented Nov 4, 2017

Is this error message going to get update to remove the in Rpm part?

@muuki88
Copy link
Contributor

muuki88 commented Nov 4, 2017

IIRC the error message comes from rpm itself. However we plan a validation task in #1026 that will help you figure out the configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants