feature-sliced

WIP: The current version of the methodology is under development and some details can be changed

FeatureSliced is an architectural design methodology for frontend applications. It aims to divide an application according to business logic and scopes of responsibility

• Provides explicitness, controllability and adaptability of architecture
• Based on time-tested design practices and concepts

  SOLID, GRASP, DDD, Separation of Concerns, Vertical Slices, Public API, Isolation

• Suggests dividing the project according to business units

Note: The methodology is not tied to a specific tech stack and is applicable to any frontend projects in general.

But the current version is based on and provides examples for JavaScript + React stack.

Motivation

Usually, approaches to building the frontend architecture from project to project are re-invented from scratch, thereby adding "project knowledge"

Despite the fact that the specifics of frontend projects do not differ so much

At the same time, incorrectly made decisions often lead to problems of scalability of the project and the team.

And therefore, instead of inventing and documenting it every time, it is better to summarize the experience and form a working, battle-tested and documented methodology for designing the frontend architecture.

Yes, there are many practices and patterns (SOLID, GRASP, DDD, ...)

But for the frontend it is highly difficult to find well-established and specific approaches

Overview

The methodology is designed to simplify and standardize the decomposition of logic for large and long-lived projects.

To do this, it introduces a number of concepts and abstractions, on which the architecture can be based from project to project - from here we get a number of advantages

Note: Module - the structural unit of the project (file / directory)

Explicit business logic

Modules are distributed according to scope of influence, business responsibility and technical purpose

Thanks to this, the architecture is standardized and becomes easier to read

Adaptation to new conditions

Each component of the architecture has its own purpose and does not affect the others

Thanks to this it is possible to independently modify the functionality of the application to meet new requirements without unforeseen consequences

Technical debt and refactoring

Each module is independent and self-sufficient

Thanks to this you can rewrite it from scratch without unexpected side effects

Scaling the project and the team

The increase in functionality leads to significantly less complexity of the project, since all the logic is distributed deterministically and in isolation

Thanks to this it is easy to add and onboard new people to the team, as well as expand the functionality of the project

Controlled reuse of logic

Each module has its own limitations and recommendations for reuse according to its layer

Thanks to this, a balance is maintained between compliance with the DRY principle and the ability to customize the module logic without overhead overrides

Concepts

Public API

Each module must have a declaration of its public API at the top level

• To connect to other modules, without the need to refer to the internal structure of this module
• To isolate the implementation details from the consumer modules
• Also, the Public API should protect the module interface after refactoring - in order to avoid unforeseen consequences

Isolation

The module should not depend directly on other modules of the same layer or overlying layers

• The concept is also known as Low Coupling & High Cohesion - to prevent implicit connections / side effects during development and refactoring

Needs driven

Orientation to the needs of the business and the user

• Also includes splitting the structure by business domains (so-called "slices")

Abstractions

For architecture design the methodology suggests operating with familiar abstractions, but in a more consistent and consistent order.

Visual diagram

WIP: The scheme-represents only an approximate division of the project into modules and will be determined definitively closer to the release

Layers

The first level of abstraction is according to the scope of influence

• app - application initialization (init, styles, providers, ...)
• processes - application business processes that manage pages (payment, auth, ...)
• pages - application pages (user-page, ...)
• features - parts of the application functionality (auth-by-oauth, ...)
• entities - business entities (viewer, order, ...)
• shared - reused infrastructure code (UIKit, libs, API, ...)

Slices

The second level of abstraction is according to the business domain

The rules by which the code is divided into slices depend on the specific project and its business rules and are not determined by the methodology

Segments

The third level of abstraction is according to the purpose in the implementation

• ui - UI-representation of the module (components, widgets, canvas, ...)
• model - business logic of the module (store, effects/actions, hooks/contracts, ...)
• lib - auxiliary libraries
• api - the logic of interaction with the API
• config - the configuration module of the application and its environment

Note: In most cases, it is recommended to place api and config only in the shared layer

Structure

└── src/
    ├── app/                    # Layer: Application
    |                           #
    ├── processes/              # Layer: Processes (optional)
    |   ├── {some-process}/     #     Slice: (e.g. CartPayment process)
    |   |   ├── lib/            #         Segment: Infrastructure-logic (helpers)
    |   |   └── model/          #         Segment: Business Logic
    |   ...                     #
    |                           #
    ├── pages/                  # Layer: Pages
    |   ├── {some-page}/        #     Slice: (e.g. ProfilePage page)
    |   |   ├── lib/            #         Segment: Infrastructure-logic (helpers)
    |   |   ├── model/          #         Segment: Business Logic
    |   |   └── ui/             #         Segment: UI logic
    |   ...                     #
    |                           #
    ├── features/               # Layer: Features
    |   ├── {some-feature}/     #     Slice: (e.g. AuthByPhone feature)
    |   |   ├── lib/            #         Segment: Infrastructure-logic (helpers)
    |   |   ├── model/          #         Segment: Business Logic
    |   |   └── ui/             #         Segment: UI logic
    |   ...                     #
    |                           #
    ├── entities/               # Layer: Business entities
    |   ├── {some-entity}/      #     Slice: (e.g. entity User)
    |   |   ├── lib/            #         Segment: Infrastructure-logic (helpers)
    |   |   ├── model/          #         Segment: Business Logic
    |   |   └── ui/             #         Segment: UI logic
    |   ...                     #
    |                           #
    ├── shared/                 # Layer: Reused resources
    |   ├── api/                #         Segment: Logic of API requests
    |   ├── config/             #         Segment: Конфигурация приложения
    |   ├── lib/                #         Segment: Infrastructure-application logic
    |   └── ui/                 #         Segment: UIKit of the application
    |   ...                     #
    |                           #
    └── index.tsx/              #

Further reading

• Methodology documentation

  Get-Started, Concepts, Guides, Reference, About

• Migration from feature-slices@v1
• Other materials
  • Another versions of the methodology: feature-slices, feature-driven
  • React SPB Meetup Report #1 - Feature Slices
  • Feature Driven Architecture - Oleg Isonen
  • A feature based approach to React development
  • Why React developers should modularize their applications?
  • How to Organize Your React + Redux Codebase
  • The Humanizing Work Guide to Splitting User Stories (aka "Vetical Slices")

• Discussions on the methodology
  • Real application examples, questions, problems, ideas of the methodology are discussed and analyzed here
  • All this together affects the specification, the toolkit and, in general, the further vision and development of the methodology
  • That is, everything that is not yet in the specification/toolkit is somehow discussed in github-discussions
• How can I help?
  • ⭐ Rate us on GitHub
  • 💫 Any assistance is important - from feedback to participation in the development of the methodology!

                          

Contributors ✨

Thanks goes to these wonderful people (emoji key):

Sergey Sova 📝 📖 💡 🤔 📆 💬 🚇 🔬 📋 ✅ 📢 🚧	Ilya Azin 📖 💡 🤔 📆 💬 👀 🚇 📓 🎨 ✅ 📢 🚧	Rin 狐 Akaia 📖 🖋 🤔 💬 🌍 📢 🚧	Alexander Khoroshikh 📖 🤔 💬 👀 🔧 🛡️ 📢 ✅ 🚧	Bear Raytracer 📖 💡 🤔 💬 👀 🌍 🎨 🚇 🚧
spotsccc 📖 💡 🤔 💬 👀 🚧	Ilya 📖 🤔 📢 🚧	Evgeniy Podgaetskiy 🤔 🚧	Viktor Pasynok 📖 🤔 📆 📢	Oleh 📖 🤔 ✅
Niyaz 💡 📓	Viacheslav Zinovev 🎨 📓 👀	Alexandr 🤔 📓 👀	Oleg Isonen 🤔 🔬 📓	Julie Obolenskaya 🌍
Roman Tikhiy 📓 📖	Igor Kamyshev 🐛 📖	Roman 📓 📖	Sergey Vakhramov 🎨	Mark Omarov 📖
Дмитрий 💼 📓	Mihir Shah 🎨	sarmong 📖	And 🚇 📖 💻	Gleb 📖
Roma Karvacky 💡	Aleksandr Osipov 📓	Maxim 📓	Anton Kosykh 📓	Vladislav Samatov 📓
Oleg Kusov 📝 📓	Andrey Savelev 📓	Nickolay Ilchenko 📓	Eugene Ledenev 🔣	Vladislav Romanov 🔣
Evgeniy 💻 🔌 🔧	Ainur 📖

This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome!