Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.33.6 #8671

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 17, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@portabletext/editor (source) ^1.33.5 -> ^1.33.6 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

portabletext/editor (@​portabletext/editor)

v1.33.6

Bug Fixes
  • block.set: remove reliance on knowing block type (eaa9f0c)
  • block.unset: remove reliance on knowing block type (12d01fc)
  • behaviors: remove text block.(set|unset) (be9d834)
  • deps: update sanity monorepo to ^3.75.1 (144b978)
  • improve block parsing (5a14b0e)
Dependencies

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2025 13:52
@renovate renovate bot requested review from juice49 and removed request for a team February 17, 2025 13:52
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 17, 2025 13:52
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 17, 2025 3:42pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 17, 2025 3:42pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 17, 2025 3:42pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 17, 2025 3:42pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 17, 2025 3:42pm

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@portabletext/editor@1.33.5

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.75% 54381 / 127184
🔵 Statements 42.75% 54381 / 127184
🔵 Functions 48.09% 2787 / 5795
🔵 Branches 79.37% 10569 / 13315
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30580 for commit dc2cd5f by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 17 Feb 2025 20:37:13 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 26.7 efps (38ms) 28.2 efps (36ms) -2ms (-5.3%)
article (body) 72.5 efps (14ms) 78.1 efps (13ms) -1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 27.0 efps (37ms) 28.6 efps (35ms) -2ms (-5.4%)
article (string inside array) 24.4 efps (41ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) -3ms (-7.3%)
recipe (name) 47.6 efps (21ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) -1ms (-4.8%)
recipe (description) 52.6 efps (19ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) -1ms (-5.3%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 20.4 efps (49ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) -3ms (-6.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 44ms 50ms 420ms 734ms 10.9s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 21ms 151ms 180ms 5.0s
article (string inside object) 37ms 40ms 45ms 74ms 222ms 6.7s
article (string inside array) 41ms 43ms 46ms 283ms 350ms 6.9s
recipe (name) 21ms 25ms 28ms 44ms 0ms 7.8s
recipe (description) 19ms 21ms 23ms 45ms 0ms 4.7s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 8ms 10ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 49ms 54ms 60ms 362ms 874ms 12.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 54ms 71ms 437ms 949ms 8.0s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 36ms 37ms 39ms 325ms 555ms 9.7s
article (body) 13ms 15ms 22ms 121ms 189ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 35ms 37ms 45ms 147ms 120ms 6.7s
article (string inside array) 38ms 40ms 45ms 151ms 116ms 6.5s
recipe (name) 20ms 21ms 23ms 41ms 0ms 8.4s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 21ms 45ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 9ms 10ms 35ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 49ms 55ms 67ms 394ms 1162ms 13.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 47ms 50ms 54ms 105ms 529ms 7.6s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 17, 2025 3:56 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (5) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 20s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 41s 3 0 3
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 0s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 30s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 17s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 31s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 57s 14 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 55s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 3m 1s 20 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 15s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 31s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 3s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from 5131e65 to dc2cd5f Compare February 17, 2025 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant