Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/insert-menu to v1.1.2 #8668

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 17, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/insert-menu (source) ^1.1.1 -> ^1.1.2 age adoption passing confidence
@sanity/insert-menu (source) 1.1.1 -> 1.1.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/insert-menu)

v1.1.2

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2025 13:06
@renovate renovate bot requested review from RitaDias and removed request for a team February 17, 2025 13:06
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 17, 2025 13:06
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 17, 2025 1:33pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 17, 2025 1:33pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 17, 2025 1:33pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 17, 2025 1:33pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 17, 2025 1:33pm

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@sanity/insert-menu@1.1.1

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.73% 54334 / 127137
🔵 Statements 42.73% 54334 / 127137
🔵 Functions 48.08% 2786 / 5794
🔵 Branches 79.26% 10512 / 13262
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30547 for commit 3fcf186 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:45:12 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 23.5 efps (43ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) -5ms (-10.6%)
article (body) 78.1 efps (13ms) 72.5 efps (14ms) +1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 26.3 efps (38ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) -1ms (-2.6%)
article (string inside array) 23.3 efps (43ms) 23.5 efps (43ms) -1ms (-1.2%)
recipe (name) 47.6 efps (21ms) 47.6 efps (21ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (description) 52.6 efps (19ms) 52.6 efps (19ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 20.4 efps (49ms) 18.7 efps (54ms) +5ms (+9.2%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 19.6 efps (51ms) +1ms (+2.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 43ms 67ms 82ms 484ms 882ms 11.3s
article (body) 13ms 15ms 27ms 80ms 248ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 38ms 41ms 50ms 62ms 200ms 6.9s
article (string inside array) 43ms 46ms 50ms 155ms 355ms 7.3s
recipe (name) 21ms 22ms 27ms 45ms 1ms 8.1s
recipe (description) 19ms 20ms 21ms 28ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 23ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 49ms 53ms 67ms 214ms 867ms 12.0s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 52ms 58ms 182ms 521ms 7.8s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 41ms 67ms 446ms 804ms 11.0s
article (body) 14ms 17ms 29ms 71ms 187ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 37ms 42ms 44ms 266ms 188ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 43ms 46ms 52ms 180ms 368ms 7.1s
recipe (name) 21ms 23ms 25ms 38ms 0ms 7.0s
recipe (description) 19ms 20ms 23ms 29ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 17ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 54ms 56ms 64ms 114ms 975ms 13.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 51ms 53ms 57ms 353ms 1062ms 8.8s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 17, 2025 1:37 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (3) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 10s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 35s 3 0 3
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 53s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 15s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 8s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 33s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 3s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant