Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): Update dev-non-major #8174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

fix(deps): Update dev-non-major #8174

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 3, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/icons (source) ^3.5.6 -> ^3.5.7 age adoption passing confidence
@sanity/visual-editing (source) 2.11.3 -> 2.11.4 age adoption passing confidence
next (source) 15.1.2 -> 15.1.3 age adoption passing confidence
next (source) 14.2.21 -> 14.2.22 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/visual-editing)

v2.11.4

Bug Fixes
  • temporarily disable react compiler (5cbaefa)
vercel/next.js (next)

v15.1.3

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2025 15:27
@renovate renovate bot requested review from ricokahler and removed request for a team January 3, 2025 15:27
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2025 3:38pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2025 3:38pm
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2025 3:38pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 3, 2025 3:38pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 3, 2025 3:38pm

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge January 3, 2025 15:27
@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/next@14.2.22 Transitive: environment, filesystem +8 88 MB rauchg, timneutkens, vercel-release-bot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@sanity/visual-editing@2.11.3, npm/next@14.2.21

View full report↗︎

Merged via the queue into next with commit 60cede8 Jan 3, 2025
31 of 35 checks passed
Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
License Policy Violation npm/next@14.2.22
  • License: CC-BY-SA-4.0 - Not allowed by license policy (package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE, package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE)
⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a license policy violation?

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Find a package that does not violate your license policy or adjust your policy to allow this package's license.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/next@14.2.22

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 3, 2025 3:34 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 39s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 50s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 27s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 39s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:39:30 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 25.6 efps (39ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) -2ms (-5.1%)
article (body) 50.5 efps (20ms) 51.7 efps (19ms) -0ms (-2.3%)
article (string inside object) 27.8 efps (36ms) 29.4 efps (34ms) -2ms (-5.6%)
article (string inside array) 25.0 efps (40ms) 25.6 efps (39ms) -1ms (-2.5%)
recipe (name) 45.5 efps (22ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) -4ms (-18.2%)
recipe (description) 52.6 efps (19ms) 58.8 efps (17ms) -2ms (-10.5%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (7ms) 99.9+ efps (8ms) +1ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 19.2 efps (52ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) -3ms (-5.8%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.2 efps (50ms) 19.6 efps (51ms) +2ms (+3.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 43ms 74ms 546ms 1025ms 11.6s
article (body) 20ms 24ms 68ms 190ms 239ms 5.8s
article (string inside object) 36ms 39ms 43ms 141ms 132ms 6.9s
article (string inside array) 40ms 43ms 47ms 74ms 129ms 7.0s
recipe (name) 22ms 24ms 39ms 54ms 0ms 8.0s
recipe (description) 19ms 21ms 22ms 51ms 0ms 4.7s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 10ms 14ms 22ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 52ms 56ms 63ms 313ms 500ms 13.4s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 53ms 59ms 365ms 480ms 8.3s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 37ms 43ms 62ms 445ms 747ms 10.4s
article (body) 19ms 25ms 28ms 165ms 245ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 34ms 37ms 44ms 72ms 129ms 6.3s
article (string inside array) 39ms 43ms 46ms 76ms 130ms 6.7s
recipe (name) 18ms 20ms 23ms 37ms 0ms 6.8s
recipe (description) 17ms 18ms 21ms 31ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 8ms 9ms 11ms 12ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 49ms 52ms 59ms 200ms 147ms 12.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 51ms 55ms 63ms 395ms 687ms 8.0s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant