Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix restoration of read base feature code. #1590

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

cmnbroad
Copy link
Collaborator

@cmnbroad cmnbroad commented Jan 3, 2022

Fixes #1379. This was originally marked as fixed in the 2020 refactoring branch, but @yash-puligundla ran into it while verifying compliance with hts-specs files for #1587.

@cmnbroad cmnbroad force-pushed the cn_cram_compliance branch from 214a220 to d572221 Compare January 4, 2022 13:53
@cmnbroad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cmnbroad commented Jan 4, 2022

@yash-puligundla FYI, in case you have review comments or questions (for some reason I can't tag you as a reviewer). You might want to include these changes for any subsequent compliance tests your run.

@yash-puligundla
Copy link
Contributor

yash-puligundla commented Jan 4, 2022 via email

Copy link
Member

@lbergelson lbergelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cmnbroad This looks good to me.

@lbergelson lbergelson merged commit b5af659 into master Feb 7, 2022
@lbergelson lbergelson deleted the cn_cram_compliance branch February 7, 2022 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bases in 'Bases' read features ('BB' data series) aren't correctly restored on read
3 participants