Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

samtools / htsjdk Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 245
Star 285

Code
Issues 266
Pull requests 46
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

CRAM: Be explicit about spec IDs instead of using ordinal()#1221

Merged

lbergelson merged 4 commits intomastersamtools/htsjdk:masterfrom jt_encoding_ordinalsamtools/htsjdk:jt_encoding_ordinalCopy head branch name to clipboard

Nov 6, 2018

+87-21

Conversation Commits4 (4)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Nov 6, 2018

Be explicit about spec IDs for encodings instead of using ordinal()
jmthibault79
committed
kill a few more ordinals
jmthibault79
committed
rename and javadoc
jmthibault79
committed
more javadoc
jmthibault79
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.