Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

formulas.jinja: python 2.6 support #145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2015

Conversation

peterdemin
Copy link

This is follow up for #144 (Forgot to fix same issue in formulas.sls)

As described in https://docs.python.org/2/library/string.html

Changed in version 2.7: The positional argument specifiers can be omitted, so '{} {}' is equivalent to '{0} {1}'.

In python 2.6 this feature is not available.
CentOS 6.5 still has python 2.6, so it would be nice to support it.

nmadhok added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2015
formulas.jinja: python 2.6 support
@nmadhok nmadhok merged commit c358d4d into saltstack-formulas:master Jun 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants