Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing Typescript support in container #47

Closed
1 task
svettwer opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
1 task

Missing Typescript support in container #47

svettwer opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@svettwer

Comments

@svettwer
Copy link
Contributor

svettwer commented Apr 2, 2020

As a Sakuli user, I would like to execute Typescript based tests in the container, because... well... I paid for it and it is broken. xD

Acceptance criteria:

  • It is possible to execute Typescript tests in a container.
@svettwer svettwer self-assigned this Jun 25, 2020
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) Added typescript and sakuli legacy types to container
60616f6
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) Added e2e testsuite
5b87ee7
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) link global node_modules to the actual test suite + Add forward…
93f2114 
…er config
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) removed forwarder config as forwarder config parser bugs have b…
201834b 
…een solved
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) Only link node_modules if SAKULI_TEST_SUITE is set
39b7731
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) backup/restore original node_modules if present
f3b206e
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) cleanup, even if sakuli check fails.
56a5540
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) Added branch builds
84ed5b4
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) specified branch pattern
a0faa44
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) Changed branch pattern to recognize all branch names containing…
77e7cb6 
… / => therefore exluding master and develop
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) [WIP] change test execution to prevent insufficient permission …
34d1c7e 
…issues when linking into volume
@svettwer svettwer mentioned this issue Jul 29, 2020
Closed
svettwer added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2020
@svettwer
(#47) Added second test run with altered docker container user
922f917
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@svettwer svettwer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@s1hofmann @svettwer