Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix shell check warning #3121

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2023

Conversation

Rustin170506
Copy link
Member

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 commented Dec 7, 2022

See: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/actions/runs/3622731921/jobs/6133180965
It may be that our shell checker is updated.

SC1091 is pretty annoying and it prints some warning in our test scripts. So I excluded it.

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 force-pushed the rustin-patch-shell-check branch 2 times, most recently from ec53374 to b5541c3 Compare December 7, 2022 01:15
@rbtcollins
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! so SC1091 means shellcheck couldn't read the file. I can't see those action logs they are too far back; perhaps we can see them somewhere else? I think it would be good to fix the problem rather than disabling the checks.

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 force-pushed the rustin-patch-shell-check branch from b67b540 to cbea87d Compare January 10, 2023 02:17
ci/raw_init.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 force-pushed the rustin-patch-shell-check branch from 79f29e9 to c69e6a2 Compare January 12, 2023 02:02
@rbtcollins rbtcollins merged commit cafafcc into rust-lang:master Jan 12, 2023
@rbtcollins
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for all the work on this

@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for your review! 💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 deleted the rustin-patch-shell-check branch January 12, 2023 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants