Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update error code docs to reflect recent changes #1625

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion book.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,5 +48,6 @@ warning-policy = "error"

[output.html.redirect]
"/compiletest.html" = "tests/compiletest.html"
"/diagnostics/sessiondiagnostic.html" = "diagnostics/diagnostic-structs.html"
"/diagnostics/sessiondiagnostic.html" = "diagnostic-structs.html"
"/diagnostics/diagnostic-codes.html" = "error-codes.html"
"/miri.html" = "const-eval/interpret.html"
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/SUMMARY.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
- [Diagnostic and subdiagnostic structs](./diagnostics/diagnostic-structs.md)
- [Translation](./diagnostics/translation.md)
- [`LintStore`](./diagnostics/lintstore.md)
- [Diagnostic codes](./diagnostics/diagnostic-codes.md)
- [Error codes](./diagnostics/error-codes.md)
- [Diagnostic items](./diagnostics/diagnostic-items.md)
- [`ErrorGuaranteed`](./diagnostics/error-guaranteed.md)

Expand Down
22 changes: 10 additions & 12 deletions src/diagnostics.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,17 +69,12 @@ surrounded with backticks:
error: the identifier `foo.bar` is invalid
```

### Error explanations
### Error codes and explanations

Some errors include long form descriptions. They may be viewed with the
`--explain` flag, or via the [error index]. Each explanation comes with an
example of how to trigger it and advice on how to fix it.

Please read [RFC 1567] for details on how to format and write long error
codes.

The descriptions are written in Markdown, and all of them are linked in the
[`rustc_error_codes`] crate.
Most errors have an associated error code. Error codes are linked to long-form
explanations which contains an example of how to trigger the error and in-depth
details about the error. They may be viewed with the `--explain` flag, or via
the [error index].

As a general rule, give an error a code (with an associated explanation) if the
explanation would give more information than the error itself. A lot of the time
Expand All @@ -89,12 +84,15 @@ triggers to include useful information for all cases in the error, in which case
it's a good idea to add an explanation.[^estebank]
As always, if you are not sure, just ask your reviewer!

If you decide to add a new error with an associated error code, please read
[this section][error-codes] for a guide and important details about the
process.

[^estebank]: This rule of thumb was suggested by **@estebank** [here][estebank-comment].

[`rustc_error_codes`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_error_codes/error_codes/index.html
[error index]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html
[RFC 1567]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1567-long-error-codes-explanation-normalization.md
[estebank-comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/967#issuecomment-733218283
[error-codes]: ./diagnostics/error-codes.md

### Lints versus fixed diagnostics

Expand Down
79 changes: 0 additions & 79 deletions src/diagnostics/diagnostic-codes.md

This file was deleted.

95 changes: 95 additions & 0 deletions src/diagnostics/error-codes.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
# Error codes
We generally try to assign each error message a unique code like `E0123`. These
codes are defined in the compiler in the `diagnostics.rs` files found in each
crate, which basically consist of macros. All error codes have an associated
explanation: new error codes must include them. Note that not all _historical_
(no longer emitted) error codes have explanations.

## Error explanations

The explanations are written in Markdown (see the [CommonMark Spec] for
specifics around syntax), and all of them are linked in the [`rustc_error_codes`]
crate. Please read [RFC 1567] for details on how to format and write long error
codes. As of <!-- date-check --> February 2023, there is an
effort[^new-explanations] to replace this largely outdated RFC with a new more
flexible standard.

Error explanations should expand on the error message and provide details about
_why_ the error occurs. It is not helpful for users to copy-paste a quick fix;
explanations should help users understand why their code cannot be accepted by
the compiler. Rust prides itself on helpful error messages and long-form
explanations are no exception. However, before error explanations are
overhauled[^new-explanations] it is a bit open as to how exactly they should be
written, as always: ask your reviewer or ask around on the Rust Discord or Zulip.

[^new-explanations]: See the draft RFC [here][new-explanations-rfc].

[`rustc_error_codes`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_error_codes/error_codes/index.html
[CommonMark Spec]: https://spec.commonmark.org/current/
[RFC 1567]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1567-long-error-codes-explanation-normalization.md
[new-explanations-rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3370

## Allocating a fresh code

Error codes are stored in `compiler/rustc_error_codes`.

To create a new error, you first need to find the next available
code. You can find it with `tidy`:

```
./x.py test tidy
```

This will invoke the tidy script, which generally checks that your code obeys
our coding conventions. Some of these jobs check error codes and ensure that
there aren't duplicates, etc (the tidy check is defined in
`src/tools/tidy/src/error_codes.rs`). Once it is finished with that, tidy will
Ezrashaw marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
print out the highest used error code:

```
...
tidy check
Found 505 error codes
Highest error code: `E0591`
...
```

Here we see the highest error code in use is `E0591`, so we _probably_ want
`E0592`. To be sure, run `rg E0592` and check, you should see no references.

You will have to write an extended description for your error,
which will go in `rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0592.md`.
To register the error, open `rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes.rs` and add the
code (in its proper numerical order) into` register_diagnostics!` macro, like
this:

```rust
register_diagnostics! {
...
E0592: include_str!("./error_codes/E0592.md"),
}
```

To actually issue the error, you can use the `struct_span_err!` macro:

```rust
struct_span_err!(self.tcx.sess, // some path to the session here
span, // whatever span in the source you want
E0592, // your new error code
fluent::example::an_error_message)
.emit() // actually issue the error
```

If you want to add notes or other snippets, you can invoke methods before you
call `.emit()`:

```rust
struct_span_err!(...)
.span_label(another_span, fluent::example::example_label)
.span_note(another_span, fluent::example::separate_note)
.emit()
```

For an example of a PR adding an error code, see [#76143].

[#76143]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76143