-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make sure ScalarPair enums have ScalarPair variants; add some layout sanity checks #96872
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -220,6 +220,111 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for LayoutError<'tcx> { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Enforce some basic invariants on layouts. | ||
fn sanity_check_layout<'tcx>( | ||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | ||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | ||
layout: &TyAndLayout<'tcx>, | ||
) { | ||
// Type-level uninhabitedness should always imply ABI uninhabitedness. | ||
if tcx.conservative_is_privately_uninhabited(param_env.and(layout.ty)) { | ||
assert!(layout.abi.is_uninhabited()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if cfg!(debug_assertions) { | ||
fn check_layout_abi<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, layout: Layout<'tcx>) { | ||
match layout.abi() { | ||
Abi::Scalar(_scalar) => { | ||
// No padding in scalars. | ||
/* FIXME(#96185): | ||
assert_eq!( | ||
layout.align().abi, | ||
scalar.align(&tcx).abi, | ||
"alignment mismatch between ABI and layout in {layout:#?}" | ||
); | ||
assert_eq!( | ||
layout.size(), | ||
scalar.size(&tcx), | ||
"size mismatch between ABI and layout in {layout:#?}" | ||
);*/ | ||
} | ||
Abi::Vector { count, element } => { | ||
// No padding in vectors. Alignment can be strengthened, though. | ||
assert!( | ||
layout.align().abi >= element.align(&tcx).abi, | ||
"alignment mismatch between ABI and layout in {layout:#?}" | ||
); | ||
let size = element.size(&tcx) * count; | ||
assert_eq!( | ||
layout.size(), | ||
size.align_to(tcx.data_layout().vector_align(size).abi), | ||
"size mismatch between ABI and layout in {layout:#?}" | ||
); | ||
} | ||
Abi::ScalarPair(scalar1, scalar2) => { | ||
// Sanity-check scalar pairs. These are a bit more flexible and support | ||
// padding, but we can at least ensure both fields actually fit into the layout | ||
// and the alignment requirement has not been weakened. | ||
let align1 = scalar1.align(&tcx).abi; | ||
let align2 = scalar2.align(&tcx).abi; | ||
assert!( | ||
layout.align().abi >= cmp::max(align1, align2), | ||
"alignment mismatch between ABI and layout in {layout:#?}", | ||
); | ||
let field2_offset = scalar1.size(&tcx).align_to(align2); | ||
assert!( | ||
layout.size() >= field2_offset + scalar2.size(&tcx), | ||
"size mismatch between ABI and layout in {layout:#?}" | ||
); | ||
} | ||
Abi::Uninhabited | Abi::Aggregate { .. } => {} // Nothing to check. | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
check_layout_abi(tcx, layout.layout); | ||
|
||
if let Variants::Multiple { variants, .. } = &layout.variants { | ||
for variant in variants { | ||
check_layout_abi(tcx, *variant); | ||
// No nested "multiple". | ||
assert!(matches!(variant.variants(), Variants::Single { .. })); | ||
// Skip empty variants. | ||
if variant.size() == Size::ZERO | ||
|| variant.fields().count() == 0 | ||
|| variant.abi().is_uninhabited() | ||
{ | ||
// These are never actually accessed anyway, so we can skip them. (Note that | ||
// sometimes, variants with fields have size 0, and sometimes, variants without | ||
// fields have non-0 size.) | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
// Variants should have the same or a smaller size as the full thing. | ||
if variant.size() > layout.size { | ||
bug!( | ||
"Type with size {} bytes has variant with size {} bytes: {layout:#?}", | ||
layout.size.bytes(), | ||
variant.size().bytes(), | ||
) | ||
} | ||
// The top-level ABI and the ABI of the variants should be coherent. | ||
let abi_coherent = match (layout.abi, variant.abi()) { | ||
(Abi::Scalar(..), Abi::Scalar(..)) => true, | ||
(Abi::ScalarPair(..), Abi::ScalarPair(..)) => true, | ||
(Abi::Uninhabited, _) => true, | ||
(Abi::Aggregate { .. }, _) => true, | ||
_ => false, | ||
}; | ||
if !abi_coherent { | ||
bug!( | ||
"Variant ABI is incompatible with top-level ABI:\nvariant={:#?}\nTop-level: {layout:#?}", | ||
variant | ||
); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[instrument(skip(tcx, query), level = "debug")] | ||
fn layout_of<'tcx>( | ||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | ||
|
@@ -263,10 +368,7 @@ fn layout_of<'tcx>( | |
|
||
cx.record_layout_for_printing(layout); | ||
|
||
// Type-level uninhabitedness should always imply ABI uninhabitedness. | ||
if tcx.conservative_is_privately_uninhabited(param_env.and(ty)) { | ||
assert!(layout.abi.is_uninhabited()); | ||
} | ||
sanity_check_layout(tcx, param_env, &layout); | ||
|
||
Ok(layout) | ||
}) | ||
|
@@ -1313,9 +1415,11 @@ impl<'tcx> LayoutCx<'tcx, TyCtxt<'tcx>> { | |
}; | ||
let mut abi = Abi::Aggregate { sized: true }; | ||
|
||
// Without latter check aligned enums with custom discriminant values | ||
// Would result in ICE see the issue #92464 for more info | ||
if tag.size(dl) == size || variants.iter().all(|layout| layout.is_empty()) { | ||
if layout_variants.iter().all(|v| v.abi.is_uninhabited()) { | ||
abi = Abi::Uninhabited; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I reordered this a bit so it better fits the pattern of these three branches here computing the Rewriting this without mutable variables would be cleaner but that is an undertaking for someone else. ;) |
||
} else if tag.size(dl) == size || variants.iter().all(|layout| layout.is_empty()) { | ||
// Without latter check aligned enums with custom discriminant values | ||
// Would result in ICE see the issue #92464 for more info | ||
abi = Abi::Scalar(tag); | ||
} else { | ||
// Try to use a ScalarPair for all tagged enums. | ||
|
@@ -1389,8 +1493,22 @@ impl<'tcx> LayoutCx<'tcx, TyCtxt<'tcx>> { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
if layout_variants.iter().all(|v| v.abi.is_uninhabited()) { | ||
abi = Abi::Uninhabited; | ||
// If we pick a "clever" (by-value) ABI, we might have to adjust the ABI of the | ||
// variants to ensure they are consistent. This is because a downcast is | ||
// semantically a NOP, and thus should not affect layout. | ||
if matches!(abi, Abi::Scalar(..) | Abi::ScalarPair(..)) { | ||
for variant in &mut layout_variants { | ||
// We only do this for variants with fields; the others are not accessed anyway. | ||
// Also do not overwrite any already existing "clever" ABIs. | ||
if variant.fields.count() > 0 | ||
&& matches!(variant.abi, Abi::Aggregate { .. }) | ||
{ | ||
variant.abi = abi; | ||
// Also need to bump up the size and alignment, so that the entire value fits in here. | ||
variant.size = cmp::max(variant.size, size); | ||
variant.align.abi = cmp::max(variant.align.abi, align.abi); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
let largest_niche = Niche::from_scalar(dl, Size::ZERO, tag); | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -30,9 +30,21 @@ error: layout_of(MissingPayloadField) = Layout { | |
variants: Single { | ||
index: 0, | ||
}, | ||
abi: Aggregate { | ||
sized: true, | ||
}, | ||
abi: ScalarPair( | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=1, | ||
}, | ||
Union { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
}, | ||
), | ||
largest_niche: None, | ||
align: AbiAndPrefAlign { | ||
abi: Align(1 bytes), | ||
|
@@ -131,9 +143,22 @@ error: layout_of(CommonPayloadField) = Layout { | |
variants: Single { | ||
index: 0, | ||
}, | ||
abi: Aggregate { | ||
sized: true, | ||
}, | ||
abi: ScalarPair( | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=1, | ||
}, | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=255, | ||
}, | ||
), | ||
largest_niche: None, | ||
align: AbiAndPrefAlign { | ||
abi: Align(1 bytes), | ||
|
@@ -153,9 +178,22 @@ error: layout_of(CommonPayloadField) = Layout { | |
variants: Single { | ||
index: 1, | ||
}, | ||
abi: Aggregate { | ||
sized: true, | ||
}, | ||
abi: ScalarPair( | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=1, | ||
}, | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=255, | ||
}, | ||
), | ||
largest_niche: None, | ||
align: AbiAndPrefAlign { | ||
abi: Align(1 bytes), | ||
|
@@ -237,9 +275,21 @@ error: layout_of(CommonPayloadFieldIsMaybeUninit) = Layout { | |
variants: Single { | ||
index: 0, | ||
}, | ||
abi: Aggregate { | ||
sized: true, | ||
}, | ||
abi: ScalarPair( | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=1, | ||
}, | ||
Union { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
}, | ||
), | ||
largest_niche: None, | ||
align: AbiAndPrefAlign { | ||
abi: Align(1 bytes), | ||
|
@@ -259,9 +309,21 @@ error: layout_of(CommonPayloadFieldIsMaybeUninit) = Layout { | |
variants: Single { | ||
index: 1, | ||
}, | ||
abi: Aggregate { | ||
sized: true, | ||
}, | ||
abi: ScalarPair( | ||
Initialized { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
), | ||
valid_range: 0..=1, | ||
}, | ||
Union { | ||
value: Int( | ||
I8, | ||
false, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Looking at this makes me wish there was an There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah... and also nicer debug-printing of |
||
), | ||
}, | ||
), | ||
largest_niche: None, | ||
align: AbiAndPrefAlign { | ||
abi: Align(1 bytes), | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should at some point measure the cost of having this on by default.