-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #92826
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #92826
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sometimes an obligation depends on a later one, so we can't just process them in order like it was done previously. This is not a problem in our test suite, but there may be ICEs out there and it will definitely be a problem with lazy TAIT.
The issue here is that the logic used to determine which CGU to put the dead function stubs in doesn't handle cases where a module is never assigned to a CGU. The partitioning logic also caused issues in rust-lang#85461 where inline functions were duplicated into multiple CGUs resulting in duplicate symbols. This commit fixes the issue by removing the complex logic used to assign dead code stubs to CGUs and replaces it with a much simplier model: we pick one CGU to hold all the dead code stubs. We pick a CGU which has exported items which increases the likelihood the linker won't throw away our dead functions and we pick the smallest to minimize the impact on compilation times for crates with very large CGUs. Fixes rust-lang#86177 Fixes rust-lang#85718 Fixes rust-lang#79622
Because MIPSr6 has many differences with previous MIPSr2 arch, the previous rlib metadata stripping code in `rustc_codegen_ssa` is only for MIPSr2/r3/r5 (which share the same elf e_flags). This commit fixed this problem. It makes `rustc_codegen_ssa` happy when compiling rustc for MIPSr6 target or hosts.
Use "(associated) function" terminology instead of "method". Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
This test checks that `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` is gated behind `#![feature(rustc_attrs)]`.
Make rlib metadata strip works with MIPSr6 architecture Because MIPSr6 has many differences with previous MIPSr2 arch, the previous rlib metadata stripping code in `rustc_codegen_ssa` is only for MIPSr2/r3/r5 (which share the same elf e_flags). This commit fixed this problem. It makes `rustc_codegen_ssa` happy when compiling rustc for MIPSr6 target or hosts. e_flags REF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e356027016c6365b3d8924f54c33e2c63d931492/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L562
…imulacrum `std::path::absolute` Implements rust-lang#59117 by adding a `std::path::absolute` function that creates an absolute path without reading the filesystem. This is intended to be a drop-in replacement for [`std::fs::canonicalize`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fs/fn.canonicalize.html) in cases where it isn't necessary to resolve symlinks. It can be used on paths that don't exist or where resolving symlinks is unwanted. It can also be used to avoid circumstances where `canonicalize` might otherwise fail. On Windows this is a wrapper around [`GetFullPathNameW`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/fileapi/nf-fileapi-getfullpathnamew). On Unix it partially implements the POSIX [pathname resolution](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_13) specification, stopping just short of actually resolving symlinks.
… r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: do not emit tuple variant fields if none are documented Fixes rust-lang#90824. Before: ![2021-12-15T22:26:41](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1372438/146302871-4d265433-b9aa-4e53-adfb-e7cb92107180.png) After: ![2021-12-15T22:27:01](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1372438/146302872-e39eda3d-2fb2-4fb9-aae7-2008e4e1b4dd.png)
Add `std::error::Report` type This is a continuation of rust-lang#90174, split into a separate PR since I cannot push to `````@seanchen1991````` 's fork
…he_fold, r=nikomatsakis Welcome opaque types into the fold r? `@nikomatsakis` because idk who else to bug on the type_op changes The commits have explanations in them. The TLDR is that * 5c46002 stops the "recurse and replace" scheme that replaces opaque types with their canonical inference var by just doing that ahead of time * bdeeb07 does not affect anything on master afaict, but since opaque types generate obligations when instantiated, and lazy TAIT instantiates opaque types *everywhere*, we need to properly handle obligations here instead of just hoping no problematic obligations ever come up.
…ioning, r=tmandry [code coverage] Fix missing dead code in modules that are never called The issue here is that the logic used to determine which CGU to put the dead function stubs in doesn't handle cases where a module is never assigned to a CGU (which is what happens when all of the code in the module is dead). The partitioning logic also caused issues in rust-lang#85461 where inline functions were duplicated into multiple CGUs resulting in duplicate symbols. This commit fixes the issue by removing the complex logic used to assign dead code stubs to CGUs and replaces it with a much simpler model: we pick one CGU to hold all the dead code stubs. We pick a CGU which has exported items which increases the likelihood the linker won't throw away our dead functions and we pick the smallest to minimize the impact on compilation times for crates with very large CGUs. Fixes rust-lang#91661 Fixes rust-lang#86177 Fixes rust-lang#85718 Fixes rust-lang#79622 r? `@tmandry` cc `@richkadel` This PR is not urgent so please don't let it interrupt your holidays! 🎄 🎁
…ne_of_attr, r=Aaron1011 Implement `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` attribute This PR adds a new attribute — `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` that allows changing the "minimal complete definition" of a trait. It's similar to GHC's minimal `{-# MINIMAL #-}` pragma, though `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]` is weaker atm. Such attribute was long wanted. It can be, for example, used in `Read` trait to make transitions to recently added `read_buf` easier: ```rust #[rustc_must_implement_one_of(read, read_buf)] pub trait Read { fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize> { let mut buf = ReadBuf::new(buf); self.read_buf(&mut buf)?; Ok(buf.filled_len()) } fn read_buf(&mut self, buf: &mut ReadBuf<'_>) -> Result<()> { default_read_buf(|b| self.read(b), buf) } } impl Read for Ty0 {} //^ This will fail to compile even though all `Read` methods have default implementations // Both of these will compile just fine impl Read for Ty1 { fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize> { /* ... */ } } impl Read for Ty2 { fn read_buf(&mut self, buf: &mut ReadBuf<'_>) -> Result<()> { /* ... */ } } ``` For now, this is implemented as an internal attribute to start experimenting on the design of this feature. In the future we may want to extend it: - Allow arbitrary requirements like `a | (b & c)` - Allow multiple requirements like - ```rust #[rustc_must_implement_one_of(a, b)] #[rustc_must_implement_one_of(c, d)] ``` - Make it appear in rustdoc documentation - Change the syntax? - Etc Eventually, we should make an RFC and make this (or rather similar) attribute public. --- I'm fairly new to compiler development and not at all sure if the implementation makes sense, but at least it passes tests :)
rustc_metadata: Stop passing `CrateMetadataRef` by reference (step 1) It's already a (fat) reference. Double referencing it creates lifetime issues for its methods that want to return iterators. --- Extracted from rust-lang#92245 for a perf run. The PR changes a lot of symbol names due to function signature changes, so it's hard to do differential profiling, let's spend some machine time instead.
…uillaumeGomez rustdoc: Preserve rendering of macro_rules matchers when possible Fixes rust-lang#92331. This approach restores the behavior prior to rust-lang#86282 **if** the matcher token held by the compiler **and** the matcher token found in the source code are identical TokenTrees. Thus rust-lang#86208 remains fixed, but without regressing formatting for the vast majority of macros which are not macro-generated.
Update cargo 6 commits in 358e79fe56fe374649275ca7aebaafd57ade0e8d..06b9d31743210b788b130c8a484c2838afa6fc27 2022-01-04 18:39:45 +0000 to 2022-01-11 23:47:29 +0000 - Port cargo to clap3 (rust-lang/cargo#10265) - feat: support rustflags per profile (rust-lang/cargo#10217) - Make bors ignore the PR template so it doesn't end up in merge messages (rust-lang/cargo#10267) - Be resilient to most IO error and filesystem loop while walking dirs (rust-lang/cargo#10214) - Remove the option to disable pipelining (rust-lang/cargo#10258) - Always ask rustc for messages about artifacts, and always process them (rust-lang/cargo#10255)
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jan 12, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
📌 Commit 89bf361 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jan 13, 2022
⌛ Testing commit 89bf361 with merge dacf2e3e323899ab99193f533f54c8d395f95b68... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 13, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
std::path::absolute
#91673 (std::path::absolute
)std::error::Report
type #91938 (Addstd::error::Report
type)#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]
attribute #92164 (Implement#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]
attribute)CrateMetadataRef
by reference (step 1) #92277 (rustc_metadata: Stop passingCrateMetadataRef
by reference (step 1))Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup