Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #90769

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 10, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #90769

merged 15 commits into from
Nov 10, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

calebzulawski and others added 15 commits November 6, 2021 02:08
…yn514

Use computed visibility in rustdoc

This PR changes `librustdoc` to use computed visibility instead of syntactic visibility. It was initially part of rust-lang#88019, but was separated due to concerns that it might cause a regression somewhere we couldn't predict.

r? `@jyn514`
cc `@cjgillot` `@petrochenkov`
… r=workingjubilee

Allow simd_bitmask to return byte arrays

cc `@rust-lang/project-portable-simd` `@workingjubilee`
…less-search-index-data, r=notriddle,camelid

Remove potential useless data for search index

I uncovered this case when working on rust-lang#90726 to debug rust-lang#90385.

Explanations: if we have a full generic, we check if it has generics then we do the following:
 * If it has only one generic, we remove one nested level in order to not keep the "parent" generic (since it has empty name, it's useless after all).
 * Otherwise we add it alongside its generics.

However, I didn't handle the case where a generic had no generics. Meaning that we were adding items with empty names in the search index. So basically useless data in the search index.

r? `@camelid`
…f, r=dtolnay

Fix collections entry API documentation.

I found some documentation that seems out of date.
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Nov 10, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2021

📌 Commit 5f24975 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 10, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 5f24975 with merge 82af160...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 10, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 82af160 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 10, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 82af160 into rust-lang:master Nov 10, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 10, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (82af160): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.

  • Small improvement in instruction counts (up to -0.2% on incr-unchanged builds of hyper-2)
  • Very large regression in instruction counts (up to 84.9% on full builds of webrender-wrench)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Nov 11, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@Mark-Simulacrum could this be caused by #90361 ?
Is there a way to disable it on the benchmark server?

@hkratz
Copy link
Contributor

hkratz commented Nov 17, 2021

Since the perf regressions are in full doc builds they are more likely caused by #88447.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-266apqm branch November 20, 2021 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants