-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump bootstrap compiler to 1.57 #90042
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
r=me with CI fixed, but I'm not sure what's up with that assert failing... |
Should this wait on the backport of #90038? |
Probably not critical in some sense -- we still end up with potentially miscompiled compilers due to staging -- but it may also fix CI here? Not clear. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #90067) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
edff6d0
to
2f79e1e
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2f79e1e
to
a00e2a6
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
a00e2a6
to
dbd77c0
Compare
📌 Commit dbd77c05ed053c222f7aed1e733a462128909132 has been approved by |
FYI, the bump to min LLVM 12 is now approved in #90175. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #90175) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@bors retry -- hopefully the markdown-css error is spurious and caused by the rustc-rayon-core overflow check failure |
⌛ Testing commit abd3fe3 with merge 448d8243a1b0572c97a6ae68c3a2170541fb9ad4... |
💥 Test timed out |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit abd3fe3 with merge 7621e0fad94a3e8ce9a9eb28f0a0a2d3709a12a9... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (235d985): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Fixes #90152
r? @Mark-Simulacrum