Rollup of 9 pull requests #83426
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #83426
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In the analysis use `resolve_vars_if_possible` instead of `fully_resolve`, because we might not have performed regionck yet. Fixes: rust-lang#83176
Run analyses before thir-tree dumps Fixes rust-lang#83048
…order, r=CraftSpider,jyn514 Sidebar trait items order We were actually sorting `Symbol` and not `String`, creating a completely invalid sort result. I added a test to prevent regressions. r? `@jyn514`
Only enable assert_dep_graph when query-dep-graph is enabled. This is a debugging option. The only effect should be on rustc tests. r? `@michaelwoerister`
Add internal io::Error::new_const to avoid allocations. This makes it possible to have a io::Error containing a message with zero allocations, and uses that everywhere to avoid the *three* allocations involved in `io::Error::new(kind, "message")`. The function signature isn't perfect, because it needs a reference to the `&str`. So for now, this is just a `pub(crate)` function. Later, we'll be able to use `fn new_const<MSG: &'static str>(kind: ErrorKind)` to make that a bit better. (Then we'll also be able to use some ZST trickery if that would result in more efficient code.) See rust-lang#83352
2229 migration: Don't try resolve regions before writeback In the analysis use `resolve_vars_if_possible` instead of `fully_resolve`, because we might not have performed regionck yet. Fixes: rust-lang#83176 r? `@nikomatsakis`
Change `-W help` to display edition level. `-W help` was not honoring the `--edition` flag when displaying the default lint level. It was using the edition for sorting, but not for the final display. This isn't important right now as there aren't any edition-specific lint levels. Also, the `declare_lint` macro is broken and doesn't even allow setting them right now. However, I figure it wouldn't hurt to fix this before I forget about it, in case edition-specific lints are ever used in the future.
…sition, r=Nemo157 Codeblock tooltip position The codeblocks tooltips were misplaced. Normally, there is no top margin applied to a tooltip unless the codeblock is the first element of the doc block. The CSS rule was too vague though, applying it to all tooltips where the codeblock was the first child of its parent. Which can be easily seen with lists: Before:  After:  r? `@Nemo157`
…aumeGomez Slight visual improvements to warning boxes in the docs First I noticed that sometimes the thumbs-down emoji in the docs is hard to see and hard to look at because the yellow emoji color and the color of the box below are so bright. Especially if you look at the screen late at night you can notice it. I thought I should change that so I added a black outline around the emoji. It works using the [`text-shadow`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/text-shadow) property. It may be a bit hacky but it seems to work well and browser compatibility looks pretty good too: [browser compatibility](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/text-shadow#browser_compatibility). For consistency the microscope has the black border too. Alternatively I had `drop-shadow(0px 0px 1px black);` in mind but its [browser compatibility](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/filter-function/drop-shadow()#browser_compatibility) doesn't look as good and the blurry shadow probably doesn't look as good either. Then, I thought that now that I'm at it I could also try changing the purple color to a color you would rather expect to see for deprecation: red. For the red I've taken the blue and reused it as a foundation and moved it to the red color spectrum. But then I thought that the purple color could still be reused for something else: for the boxes that tell you about portability (e.g. _only supported on Unix_). These are currently blue. I think blue doesn't really represent danger like it should. Not being cross-platform represents a danger because if you want to compile for a different platform, your code may not compile anymore. Blue looks too friendly and is in my opinion more suitable for a box containing general information like for instance "This is available since 1.0.0". None of the current three box types (unstable, deprecated and portability) are that. I think purple is a better fit for it because it's kind of in the middle between "use it" and "don't use it". Deprecated is definitely "don't use it". To illustrate this better, here's a color spectrum: Blue = friendly, "use it".  Red = danger, "don't use it". And the purple in the middle (the color that the portability box now has) probably represents "use it if you have to", so it's not entirely friendly and not entirely a danger. That is why I think it fits. However I made one change to that existing purple: I made the outer color a bit brighter because it's outstandingly dark compared to the other outer colors of the other boxes. This is all subjective but in my opinion it looks nicer. At first you might need to get used to it though. Notice the box colors and the black outlines around the emoji shapes:  
Update cargo 8 commits in 90691f2bfe9a50291a98983b1ed2feab51d5ca55..58a961314437258065e23cb6316dfc121d96fb71 2021-03-16 21:36:55 +0000 to 2021-03-22 22:59:56 +0000 - Emit note when `--future-incompat-report` had nothing to report (rust-lang/cargo#9263) - RFC 3052: Stop including authors field in manifests made by cargo new (rust-lang/cargo#9282) - Refactor feature handling, and improve error messages. (rust-lang/cargo#9290) - Split out cargo-util package for cargo-test-support. (rust-lang/cargo#9292) - Fix redundant_semicolons warning in resolver-tests. (rust-lang/cargo#9293) - Use serde's error message option to avoid implementing `Deserialize`. (rust-lang/cargo#9237) - Allow `cargo update` to operate with the --offline flag (rust-lang/cargo#9279) - Fix typo in faq.md (rust-lang/cargo#9285)
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
|
📌 Commit 282cf89 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
⌛ Testing commit 282cf89 with merge 8ccc3e36487b5d1a5ecc470acf8368ae1db8c105... |
|
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
-W helpto display edition level. #83392 (Change-W helpto display edition level.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup