Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document why not use concat! in dbg! macro #81233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

tesuji
Copy link
Contributor

@tesuji tesuji commented Jan 21, 2021

Original title: Reduce code generated by dbg! macro
The expanded code before/after: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/hE3j95.


We cannot use concat! since file! could contains { or the expression is a block ({ .. }).
Using it will generated malformed format strings.
So let's document this reason why we don't use concat! macro at all.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 21, 2021
@tesuji tesuji changed the title Reduce code generated by dbg! macro Document why not use concat! in dbg! macro Jan 21, 2021
@KodrAus
Copy link
Contributor

KodrAus commented Jan 21, 2021

Thanks! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2021

📌 Commit 6f22803e052bfdcb0a4879940b5a3509ac890340 has been approved by KodrAus

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2021

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 21, 2021
library/std/src/macros.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
library/std/src/macros.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@users.noreply.github.com>
@KodrAus
Copy link
Contributor

KodrAus commented Jan 22, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 22, 2021

📌 Commit d0c1405 has been approved by KodrAus

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#80573 (Deny rustc::internal lints for rustdoc and clippy)
 - rust-lang#81173 (Expand docs on Iterator::intersperse)
 - rust-lang#81194 (Stabilize std::panic::panic_any.)
 - rust-lang#81202 (Don't prefix 0x for each segments in `dbg!(Ipv6)`)
 - rust-lang#81225 (Make 'docs' nullable in rustdoc-json output)
 - rust-lang#81227 (Remove doctree::StructType)
 - rust-lang#81233 (Document why not use concat! in dbg! macro)
 - rust-lang#81236 (Gracefully handle loop labels missing leading `'` in different positions)
 - rust-lang#81241 (Turn alloc's force_expr macro into a regular macro_rules.)
 - rust-lang#81242 (Enforce statically that `MIN_NON_ZERO_CAP` is calculated at compile time)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 81a60b7 into rust-lang:master Jan 22, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Jan 22, 2021
@tesuji tesuji deleted the dbg branch January 23, 2021 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants