-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make codegen tests compatible with extra inlining #78967
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,26 +1,34 @@ | ||
// compile-flags: -O | ||
// compile-flags: -O -Zmerge-functions=disabled | ||
// ignore-x86 | ||
// ignore-arm | ||
// ignore-emscripten | ||
// ignore-gnux32 | ||
// ignore 32-bit platforms (LLVM has a bug with them) | ||
|
||
// See issue #37945. | ||
// Check that LLVM understands that `Iter` pointer is not null. Issue #37945. | ||
|
||
#![crate_type = "lib"] | ||
|
||
use std::slice::Iter; | ||
|
||
// CHECK-LABEL: @is_empty_1 | ||
#[no_mangle] | ||
pub fn is_empty_1(xs: Iter<f32>) -> bool { | ||
// CHECK-NOT: icmp eq float* {{.*}}, null | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @is_empty_1( | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: start: | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = icmp ne i32* %xs.1, null | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[A]]) | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = icmp eq i32* %xs.0, %xs.1 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[B:%.*]] | ||
{xs}.next().is_none() | ||
} | ||
|
||
// CHECK-LABEL: @is_empty_2 | ||
#[no_mangle] | ||
pub fn is_empty_2(xs: Iter<f32>) -> bool { | ||
// CHECK-NOT: icmp eq float* {{.*}}, null | ||
// CHECK-LABEL: @is_empty_2 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: start: | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne i32* %xs.1, null | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[C]]) | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: [[D:%.*]] = icmp eq i32* %xs.0, %xs.1 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[D:%.*]] | ||
xs.map(|&x| x).next().is_none() | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we have
icmp ne ..., null
, it seems like we're failing the thing we meant to test, no?I don't think we should try to compare exactly what LLVM IR comes out, but perhaps something like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was fixed upstream by canonicalizing to assume.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By "it was fixed upstream", do you mean that will be in LLVM 12? Is there something we could cherry-pick?
My point is the test meant to check that LLVM knows it's not null, so we had a
CHECK-NOT: icmp eq ..., null
to that effect. Your change reveals that while we were passing that test, we're gettingicmp ne ..., null
instead, which seems just as bad. So it seems like a real bug with or without your change.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fact that pointer is not-null is expressed through
llvm.assume
that follows, see next check.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, ok, I see what you mean...