Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert "resolve: Avoid "self-confirming" import resolutions in one more case"" #78784

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2020

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Specifically, this reverts commit b20bce8 from #77421 to fix #77586.

The lang team has decided that for the time being we want to avoid the breakage here (perhaps for a future edition; though almost certainly not the upcoming one), though a future PR may want to add a lint around this case (and perhaps others) which are unlikely to be readable code.

r? @petrochenkov to confirm this is the right way to fix #77586.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 5, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Nov 5, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

beta-nominating since this targets a fix to a beta regression, #77586.

@jyn514 jyn514 added A-resolve Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 5, 2020
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

It would be nice to keep the test, but otherwise r=me.

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 5, 2020
…n one more case""

This reverts commit b20bce8.

It retains the test added in that commit as a check-pass test, intended to
prevent future (unintentional) regressions.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=petrochenkov

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 6, 2020

📌 Commit ae4f80b has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 6, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors p=1 because of beta-nom (we're T-2 weeks from release day)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 7, 2020

⌛ Testing commit ae4f80b with merge 771cc7f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 8, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 771cc7f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 8, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 771cc7f into rust-lang:master Nov 8, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.49.0 milestone Nov 8, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the revert-77421 branch November 12, 2020 15:13
@spastorino
Copy link
Member

discussed in T-compiler meeting.

@rustbot modify labels: beta-accepted

@rustbot rustbot added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Nov 12, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Nov 15, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum modified the milestones: 1.49.0, 1.48.0 Nov 15, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2020
…ulacrum

[beta] next

This backports:

* Avoid installing external LLVM dylibs rust-lang#78986
* Install CI llvm into the library directory rust-lang#79074
* Revert "Revert "resolve: Avoid "self-confirming" import resolutions in one more case"" rust-lang#78784
* Bump Rustfmt and RLS rust-lang#78775
* Enforce no-move rule of ReentrantMutex using Pin and fix UB in stdio rust-lang#77801

For RLS/rustfmt compilation to succeed:
* change the order of type arguments on ControlFlow rust-lang#76614
* Add ControlFlow::is_{break,continue} methods rust-lang#78200
* Replace run_compiler with RunCompiler builder pattern rust-lang#77649

As a dependency of rust-lang#77801:
*  Add Pin::static_ref, static_mut. rust-lang#77726
@petrochenkov petrochenkov mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-resolve Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use dep1::foo as dep1 is considered ambiguous
8 participants