Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #71876

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

tshepang and others added 8 commits May 1, 2020 22:32
- Documented rationale of current solution
- Polished documentation
When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target.
This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as
there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three
possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which
an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or
unwind tables.

Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code
size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads).
In code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful
to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to
reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than
with frame pointers, but it is still possible.

This commit adds a compiler option which allows a user to force the
addition of unwind tables. Unwind tables cannot be disabled on targets
that require them for correctness, or when using `-C panic=unwind`.
…na-kruppe

Add Option to Force Unwind Tables

When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target.
This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as
there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three
possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which
an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or
unwind tables.

Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code
size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads).
In production code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful
to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to
reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than
with frame pointers, but it is still possible.

---

This came up in discussion on rust-lang#69890, and turned out to be a fairly simple addition.

r? @hanna-kruppe
…wesleywiser

Added MIR constant propagation of Scalars into function call arguments

Now for the function call arguments!

Caveats:
1. It's only being enabled at `mir-opt-2` or higher, because currently codegen gives performance regressions with this optimization.
2. Only propagates Scalars. Tuples and references (references are `Indirect`, right??) are not being propagated into as of this PR.
3. Maybe more tests would be nice?
4. I need (shamefully) to ask @wesleywiser to write in his words (or explain to me, and then I can write it down) why we want to ignore propagation into `ScalarPairs` and `Indirect` arguments.

r? @wesleywiser
Do not try to find binop method on RHS `TyErr`

Fix rust-lang#71798.
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link
Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 4, 2020

📌 Commit cbae34c has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 4, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 4, 2020

⌛ Testing commit cbae34c with merge 1b61dd7a782bf38ab2aaddb6100e7b4d2319c940...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants