Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix rustdoc.css CSS tab-size property #70493

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2020
Merged

Fix rustdoc.css CSS tab-size property #70493

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2020

Conversation

0xd4d
Copy link
Contributor

@0xd4d 0xd4d commented Mar 28, 2020

This fixes the CSS tab size property names which are called tab-size / -moz-tab-size and not tab-width

Old issue #49155 and related PR #50947

tab-size: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/tab-size

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2020

📌 Commit 6d886af has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 28, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#70418 (Add long error explanation for E0703)
 - rust-lang#70448 (Create output dir in rustdoc markdown render)
 - rust-lang#70486 (Shrink Unicode tables (even more))
 - rust-lang#70493 (Fix rustdoc.css CSS tab-size property)
 - rust-lang#70495 (Replace last mention of IRC with Discord)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit f611193 into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2020
@0xd4d 0xd4d deleted the rustdoc-tab-size branch March 28, 2020 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants