-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
syntax: Remove Nt(Impl,Trait,Foreign)Item
#69423
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I wonder whether we have a test for trait items specifically that exercises the interaction with NtTraitItem
and parameter names on Rust 2015. It doesn't seem like this would cause any problems re. that as Annotatable::TraitItem
s would still cause us to parse using parse_trait_item
. But could you double check? r=me with that and these comments considered.
These nonterminals shouldn't be observable during parsing, they are an implementation details of, well, not even expansion, but pretty-printing. After #62667 tokens streams themselves are printed pretty nicely, so I want to try removing this piece of code in |
Updated. |
@bors r=Centril |
📌 Commit d134385 has been approved by |
syntax: Remove `Nt(Impl,Trait,Foreign)Item` Follow-up to rust-lang#69366. r? @Centril
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #67637 (Add primitive module to libcore) - #69387 (Deduplicate identifier printing a bit) - #69412 (Mark attributes consumed by `check_mod_attrs` as normal) - #69423 (syntax: Remove `Nt(Impl,Trait,Foreign)Item`) - #69429 (remove redundant clones and import) - #69457 (Clean up e0370 e0371) - #69468 ([master] Backport release notes of 1.41.1) Failed merges: r? @ghost
[experiment] expand: Stop using nonterminals when passing items to proc macro attributes Implement the suggestion from #69423 (comment). r? @ghost
Follow-up to #69366.
r? @Centril