Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: another take at fixing toolstate #68047

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2020

Conversation

pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Seems like the variable showed by $(ciCheckoutPath) on Azure Pipelines was wrong, making the toolstate script fail. This commit changes that function to return the variable previously used by the toolstate script. Other uses of the function were audited, and there should be no conflict.

Failure log: https://dev.azure.com/rust-lang/rust/_build/results?buildId=17933
r? @Mark-Simulacrum

Seems like the variable showed by $(ciCheckoutPath) on Azure Pipelines
was wrong, making the toolstate script fail. This commit changes that
function to return the variable previously used by the toolstate script.
Other uses of the function were audited, and there should be no
conflict.
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 9, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

:/

@bors r+ p=100 but can be rolled up

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2020

📌 Commit cdbb60e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 9, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2020

⌛ Testing commit cdbb60e with merge 59eb49d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
…acrum

ci: another take at fixing toolstate

Seems like the variable showed by `$(ciCheckoutPath)` on Azure Pipelines was wrong, making the toolstate script fail. This commit changes that function to return the variable previously used by the toolstate script. Other uses of the function were audited, and there should be no conflict.

Failure log: https://dev.azure.com/rust-lang/rust/_build/results?buildId=17933
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 59eb49d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 9, 2020
@bors bors merged commit cdbb60e into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2020
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

📣 Toolstate changed by #68047!

Tested on commit 59eb49d.
Direct link to PR: #68047

💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok, @rust-lang/infra).
💔 rls on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok, @rust-lang/infra).

rust-highfive added a commit to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@59eb49d.
Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#68047>

💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok, @rust-lang/infra).
💔 rls on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok, @rust-lang/infra).
@pietroalbini pietroalbini deleted the fix-toolstate-again branch December 23, 2020 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants