Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add HashSet::get_or_insert_owned #67358

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2020
Merged

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Dec 16, 2019

This is an extension for tracking issue #60896. The more-general get_or_insert_with has potential for misuse, so we might remove it, but I think get_or_insert_owned covers most use cases.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @KodrAus

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 16, 2019
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jan 8, 2020

r? @LukasKalbertodt

@cuviper cuviper force-pushed the get_or_insert_owned branch from cd65fe3 to 4ede63b Compare January 8, 2020 23:34
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jan 8, 2020

I also rebased this to meet the new formatting requirements.

@LukasKalbertodt
Copy link
Member

LGTM!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2020

📌 Commit 4ede63b has been approved by LukasKalbertodt

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 9, 2020
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
…sKalbertodt

Add HashSet::get_or_insert_owned

This is an extension for tracking issue rust-lang#60896. The more-general `get_or_insert_with` has potential for misuse, so we might remove it, but I think `get_or_insert_owned` covers most use cases.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67258 (Introduce `X..`, `..X`, and `..=X` range patterns)
 - #67358 (Add HashSet::get_or_insert_owned)
 - #67935 (Relax the Sized bounds on Pin::map_unchecked(_mut))
 - #67975 (Export public scalar statics in wasm)
 - #67988 (Change -Z time event naming scheme and make them generic activities)
 - #68006 (Recognise riscv64 in compiletest)

Failed merges:

 - #67806 (Extract `rustc_ast_passes`, move gating, & refactor linting)

r? @ghost
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
…sKalbertodt

Add HashSet::get_or_insert_owned

This is an extension for tracking issue rust-lang#60896. The more-general `get_or_insert_with` has potential for misuse, so we might remove it, but I think `get_or_insert_owned` covers most use cases.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #66254 (Make Layout::new const)
 - #67122 (Do not deduplicate diagnostics in UI tests)
 - #67358 (Add HashSet::get_or_insert_owned)
 - #67725 (Simplify into_key_slice_mut)
 - #67935 (Relax the Sized bounds on Pin::map_unchecked(_mut))
 - #67967 (Delay bug to prevent ICE in MIR borrowck)
 - #67975 (Export public scalar statics in wasm)
 - #68006 (Recognise riscv64 in compiletest)
 - #68040 (Cleanup)
 - #68054 (doc: add Null-unchecked version section to mut pointer as_mut method)

Failed merges:

 - #67258 (Introduce `X..`, `..X`, and `..=X` range patterns)

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 4ede63b into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2020
@cuviper cuviper deleted the get_or_insert_owned branch April 3, 2020 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants