-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt #64772
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @eddyb (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Sep 25, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
no-tyctxt-tx
branch
from
September 25, 2019 18:49
981d069
to
1fbcba1
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
no-tyctxt-tx
branch
from
September 25, 2019 21:25
1fbcba1
to
b8a040f
Compare
eddyb
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (cc @Zoxc)
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit b8a040f has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 26, 2019
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2019
Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context. Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about `Box<Any>` in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them. The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on `rustc_interface::Queries`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context.
Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about
Box<Any>
in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them.The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on
rustc_interface::Queries
.