Properly check the defining scope of existential types #63093
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes rust-lang#52632 Existential types (soon to be 'impl trait' aliases) can either be delcared at a top-level crate/module scope, or within another item such as an fn. Previously, we were handling the second case incorrectly when recursively searching for defining usages - we would check children of the item, but not the item itself. This lead to us missing closures that consituted a defining use of the existential type, as their opaque type instantiations are stored in the TypeckTables of their parent function. This commit ensures that we explicitly visit the defining item itself, not just its children.
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
While I don't make any behavior changes to |
Centril
reviewed
Jul 28, 2019
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | |||
| #![feature(existential_type)] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you also add some comments to this file and rename it to issue-52843-$description?
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
|
@Centril fixed |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 3e98c3a has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2019
…r=cramertj Properly check the defining scope of existential types Fixes rust-lang#52632 Existential types (soon to be 'impl trait' aliases) can either be delcared at a top-level crate/module scope, or within another item such as an fn. Previously, we were handling the second case incorrectly when recursively searching for defining usages - we would check children of the item, but not the item itself. This lead to us missing closures that consituted a defining use of the existential type, as their opaque type instantiations are stored in the TypeckTables of their parent function. This commit ensures that we explicitly visit the defining item itself, not just its children.
|
r? @cramertj |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2019
…r=cramertj Properly check the defining scope of existential types Fixes rust-lang#52632 Existential types (soon to be 'impl trait' aliases) can either be delcared at a top-level crate/module scope, or within another item such as an fn. Previously, we were handling the second case incorrectly when recursively searching for defining usages - we would check children of the item, but not the item itself. This lead to us missing closures that consituted a defining use of the existential type, as their opaque type instantiations are stored in the TypeckTables of their parent function. This commit ensures that we explicitly visit the defining item itself, not just its children.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2019
…r=cramertj Properly check the defining scope of existential types Fixes rust-lang#52632 Existential types (soon to be 'impl trait' aliases) can either be delcared at a top-level crate/module scope, or within another item such as an fn. Previously, we were handling the second case incorrectly when recursively searching for defining usages - we would check children of the item, but not the item itself. This lead to us missing closures that consituted a defining use of the existential type, as their opaque type instantiations are stored in the TypeckTables of their parent function. This commit ensures that we explicitly visit the defining item itself, not just its children.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2019
…r=cramertj Properly check the defining scope of existential types Fixes rust-lang#52632 Existential types (soon to be 'impl trait' aliases) can either be delcared at a top-level crate/module scope, or within another item such as an fn. Previously, we were handling the second case incorrectly when recursively searching for defining usages - we would check children of the item, but not the item itself. This lead to us missing closures that consituted a defining use of the existential type, as their opaque type instantiations are stored in the TypeckTables of their parent function. This commit ensures that we explicitly visit the defining item itself, not just its children.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2019
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #61965 (Remove mentions of removed `offset_to` method from `align_offset` docs) - #62928 (Syntax: Recover on `for ( $pat in $expr ) $block`) - #63000 (Impl Debug for Chars) - #63083 (Make generic parameters always use modern hygiene) - #63087 (Add very simple edition check to tidy.) - #63093 (Properly check the defining scope of existential types) - #63096 (Add tests for some `existential_type` ICEs) - #63099 (vxworks: Remove Linux-specific comments.) - #63106 (ci: Skip installing SWIG/xz on OSX ) - #63108 (Add links to None in Option doc) - #63109 (std: Fix a failing `fs` test on Windows) - #63111 (Add syntactic and semantic tests for rest patterns, i.e. `..`) Failed merges: r? @ghost
oli-obk
reviewed
Jul 30, 2019
| fn main() { | ||
| existential type Existential: Debug; | ||
| fn _unused() -> Existential { String::new() } | ||
| //~^ ERROR: concrete type differs from previous defining existential type use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
moderately confusing to have the first item (textually) talk about "previous". Maybe we should reword "previous" to "other"
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #52632
Existential types (soon to be 'impl trait' aliases) can either be
delcared at a top-level crate/module scope, or within another item such
as an fn. Previously, we were handling the second case incorrectly when
recursively searching for defining usages - we would check children of
the item, but not the item itself. This lead to us missing closures
that consituted a defining use of the existential type, as their opaque
type instantiations are stored in the TypeckTables of their parent
function.
This commit ensures that we explicitly visit the defining item itself,
not just its children.