-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NLL mentions lifetimes that are not included in printed span(s). #52973
NLL mentions lifetimes that are not included in printed span(s). #52973
Conversation
The definition point for the lifetime probably isn't the optimal thing to highlight... it would be nice, if we can do it, to highlight the relevant usage points (right)? That is, the points where the lifetime is used in the type(s) relevant to the error message. Having said that, this is better than nothing, especially since the relevant types are likely to be close to, perhaps even on the same line as, the definition point. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 2488cb6 has been approved by |
…-included-in-span, r=pnkfelix NLL mentions lifetimes that are not included in printed span(s). Part of rust-lang#52663. r? @pnkfelix
…-included-in-span, r=pnkfelix NLL mentions lifetimes that are not included in printed span(s). Part of rust-lang#52663. r? @pnkfelix
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Part of #52663.
r? @pnkfelix