Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reexport fmt::Alignment into std #51333

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2018

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Follow-up of #51078.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 3, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

cc @SimonSapin

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2018

📌 Commit 8049848 has been approved by SimonSapin

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 6, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 8049848 with merge cb8ab33...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2018
…Sapin

Reexport fmt::Alignment into std

Follow-up of #51078.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: SimonSapin
Pushing cb8ab33 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 8049848 into rust-lang:master Jun 6, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the reexport-fmt-alignment branch June 7, 2018 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants