-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 3 pull requests #51094
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 3 pull requests #51094
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fixes `'a: while break 'a {};` being treated as diverging, by tracking break expressions in the same way as in `loop` expressions.
…omatsakis Fix behaviour of divergence in while loop conditions This fixes `'a: while break 'a {};` being treated as diverging, by tracking break expressions in the same way as in `loop` expressions. Fixes rust-lang#50856. r? @nikomatsakis
…robust-wrt-nll, r=nikomatsakis make ui tests robust with respect to NLL This PR revises the `ui` tests that I could quickly identify that: 1. previously had successful compilations under non-lexical lifetimes (NLL) because they assumed lexical lifetimes, but 2. such assumption of lexical lifetimes was actually not necessarily part of the spirit of the original issue/bug we want to witness. In many cases, this is simply a matter of adding a use of a borrow so that it gets extended long enough to observe a conflict. (In some cases the revision was more subtle, such as adding a destructor, or revising the order of declaration of some variables.) ---- With these test revisions in place, I subsequently updated the expected stderr output under the NLL compiletest mode. So now we should get even more testing of NLL than we were before. Fix rust-lang#51025
…r, r=Mark-Simulacrum [master] Release notes for 1.26.1 None
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
May 26, 2018
@bors r+ p=10 |
📌 Commit 472b04d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 26, 2018
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges: