Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply temporary fix of travis-ci/dpl#788. #49217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2018
Merged

Conversation

kennytm
Copy link
Member

@kennytm kennytm commented Mar 20, 2018

No description provided.

@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Mar 20, 2018

r? @alexcrichton

See: travis-ci/dpl#788

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2018

⌛ Trying commit d888d543462bd2282c22557a0e0984d86f31495c with merge ebadc0bd4627ac6baab39fd79b02694c55318676...

@kennytm kennytm changed the title Reduce the number of deploy threads to workaround travis-ci/dpl#788. [WIP] Reduce the number of deploy threads to workaround travis-ci/dpl#788. Mar 20, 2018
@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Mar 20, 2018

@bors try

Changed to s3-eager-autoload branch as recommended in travis-ci/dpl#788 (comment). If this works, we may not need to merge this PR at all.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2018

⌛ Trying commit 54954147f53676efd4f834e466ce35e5ba503f97 with merge 341175f093511e55468965aac5138badaeb7ca75...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
State: approved= try=True

@kennytm kennytm changed the title [WIP] Reduce the number of deploy threads to workaround travis-ci/dpl#788. Apply fix of travis-ci/dpl#788. Mar 20, 2018
@kennytm kennytm changed the title Apply fix of travis-ci/dpl#788. Apply temporary fix of travis-ci/dpl#788. Mar 20, 2018
@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Mar 20, 2018

r? @alexcrichton again

According to travis-ci/dpl#788 (comment) the real fix will be released "tomorrow". I'm not sure which timezone they is referring to, but it seems we still need to land this to get the queue back for today.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ p=100

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2018

📌 Commit 20e65f1 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 20, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
Rollup of 3 pull requests

- Successful merges: #49182, #49196, #49217
- Failed merges:
@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Mar 20, 2018

@bors p=1

(Already included into the special rollup for the recent important regression fixes, so doesn't need that super-high priority anymore.)

@bors bors merged commit 20e65f1 into rust-lang:master Mar 21, 2018
@kennytm kennytm deleted the fix-dpl-788 branch March 21, 2018 01:10
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2018
…richton

dpl 1.9.5 has been released, revert rust-lang#49217.

dpl 1.9.5 has been released which includes travis-ci/dpl#789, so we could move back to the standard Travis settings before that `s3-eager-autoload` branch is removed.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2018
…richton

dpl 1.9.5 has been released, revert rust-lang#49217.

dpl 1.9.5 has been released which includes travis-ci/dpl#789, so we could move back to the standard Travis settings before that `s3-eager-autoload` branch is removed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants