Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc_mir: always run the inlining pass. #48602

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

eddyb
Copy link
Member

@eddyb eddyb commented Feb 28, 2018

DO NOT MERGE: there are still issues around debuginfo and maybe even misoptimizations.
As suggested by @pcwalton, maybe it's time to test the overhead / wins from turning MIR inlining on.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 28, 2018
@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Feb 28, 2018

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2018

⌛ Trying commit f1878ff with merge a173a82...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
rustc_mir: always run the inlining pass.

**DO NOT MERGE**: there are still issues around debuginfo and maybe even misoptimizations.
As suggested by @pcwalton, maybe it's time to test the overhead / wins from turning MIR inlining on.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 28, 2018
@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Feb 28, 2018

thread 'rustc' panicked at 'missing specialization: `<decoder::DecodeContext as SpecializedDecoder<rustc::ich::Fingerprint>>::specialized_decode` not overridden', libserialize/serialize.rs:788:9

Maybe the specialization bugs weren't fixed, huh.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Feb 28, 2018

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2018

⌛ Trying commit 92fa077 with merge cb2cbcf...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
rustc_mir: always run the inlining pass.

**DO NOT MERGE**: there are still issues around debuginfo and maybe even misoptimizations.
As suggested by @pcwalton, maybe it's time to test the overhead / wins from turning MIR inlining on.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@eddyb let me know when there is a need for me to review

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 3, 2018

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #48586) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage @eddyb! It has been a while since you updated this PR.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@eddyb closing for inactivity, feel free to reopen the PR when you have some spare time to finish this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants