Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NLL feature complete (adds feature(nll))! #46862

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
Dec 21, 2017
Merged

Conversation

nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis commented Dec 20, 2017

This is the final PR for the nll-master branch; it brings over all remaining content.

The contents of the branch include:

  • track causal information and use it to report extended errors
  • handle impl Trait in NLL code
  • improve printing of outlives errors
  • add #![feature(nll)] and some more sample tests

The commits should for the most part build independently.

r? @pnkfelix (and/or @arielb1)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #46733) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 20, 2017
@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis changed the title Nll 6 Nll 6 -- feature(nll)! Dec 20, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #46874) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@@ -1075,3 +1114,18 @@ impl<'gcx, 'tcx> ClosureRegionRequirementsExt<'gcx, 'tcx> for ClosureRegionRequi
})
}
}

trait CauseExt {
Copy link
Contributor

@arielb1 arielb1 Dec 20, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why an extension trait? We have to wait until the next snapshot for #![feature(arbitrary_self_types)]

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Old habits die hard =)

In particular, -Znll might as well imply -Zborrowck=mir by default,
just like `#![feature(nll)]` does.

Also, if NLL is in use, no reason to emit end regions. The NLL pass
just strips them out anyway.
Also, keep reporting AST-based region errors that are not occuring in
a fn body.
The "match exact bits of CFG" approach was fragile and uninformative.
// `parent_def_id`. During the first phase of type-check, this
// is true, but during NLL type-check, we sometimes encounter
// `impl Trait` types in e.g. inferred closure signatures that
// are not 'local' to the current function and hence which
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment is confusing.

If we had typeof or impl Trait associated types, this could just as well happen within the signature of a function. The thing is, we want to make a distinction between "syntactic" impl Trait types that are "bound to our function" and "free" impl Trait types that are not.

Aka if we have this:

mod some_mod {
    type Foo = impl Iterator; // not sure about the exact syntax
}

mod my_mod {
    fn foo(x: ::some_mod::Foo) -> impl Iterator { x }
}

Then in foo, ::some_mod::Foo is a "free" TyAnon while the return type is a "bound" TyAnon. Luckily for us, uses of TyAnon can't be recursive (for now?), so if a TyAnon has our own DefId then it is definitely bound to our function.

I'm not sure this is the best way to express this, but that's how things are set up for now and we are not going to refactor the world for NLL.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the case you give, we are still returning an impl Iterator, and it would still be local to foo() -- that is, when this function executes, we would have effectively desugared to:

mod my_mod {
    abstract type FooReturn: Iterator;
    fn foo(x: ::some_mod::Foo) -> FooReturn { x }

and hence we would be "instantiating" FooReturn (whose value would then get inferred to a TyAnon representing some_mod::Foo).

In fact, this is basically exactly the case that this code is designed to handle in NLL: you can construct a very similar scenario with closures and return type inference today.

I'm not sure this is the best way to express this, but that's how things are set up for now and we are not going to refactor the world for NLL.

I'm not really sure what this quite means. It doesn't seem like NLL requires any particular refactoring of the world here -- it's just that NLL exposes us to more complex cases than we had to handle before, but it's not like it's a problem to handle them. I can try to reword the comment, anyhow.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pushed a second attempt! =)

None
});

// Finally
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

truncated comment?

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis changed the title Nll 6 -- feature(nll)! NLL feature complete (adds feature(nll))! Dec 20, 2017
// `mir-opt/nll/liveness-call-subtlety.rs`. To do things
// properly, we would apply the def in call only to the
// input from the success path and not the unwind
// path. -nmatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@arielb1 arielb1 Dec 20, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

call leaves garbage in the destination on the unwind path, so the old value of the variable is still irrelevant - i.e. it's still a def.

/// appear in the return type).
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
pub struct AnonTypeDecl<'tcx> {
/// The substitutions that we apply to the abstract that that this
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: "that that"

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Dec 20, 2017

@bors r+

You could try to fix the comment if you want

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2017

📌 Commit d925f4d has been approved by arielb1

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Dec 20, 2017

@bors p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2017

⌛ Testing commit d925f4d with merge fdfb007...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
NLL feature complete (adds `feature(nll)`)!

This is the final PR for the nll-master branch; it brings over all remaining content.

The contents of the branch include:

- track causal information and use it to report extended errors
- handle `impl Trait` in NLL code
- improve printing of outlives errors
- add `#![feature(nll)]` and some more sample tests

The commits should for the most part build independently.

r? @pnkfelix (and/or @arielb1)
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: arielb1
Pushing fdfb007 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d925f4d into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2017
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
…matsakis

Remove migrate borrowck mode

Closes rust-lang#58781
Closes rust-lang#43234

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(nll)]` and the removal of `-Z borrowck`. Current borrow checking behavior of item bodies is currently done by first infering regions *lexically* and reporting any errors during HIR type checking. If there *are* any errors, then MIR borrowck (NLL) never occurs. If there *aren't* any errors, then MIR borrowck happens and any errors there would be reported. This PR removes the lexical region check of item bodies entirely and only uses MIR borrowck. Because MIR borrowck could never *not* be run for a compiled program, this should not break any programs. It does, however, change diagnostics significantly and allows a slightly larger set of programs to compile.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#43234
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2094-nll.md
Version: 1.63 (2022-06-30 => beta, 2022-08-11 => stable).

## Motivation

Over time, the Rust borrow checker has become "smarter" and thus allowed more programs to compile. There have been three different implementations: AST borrowck, MIR borrowck, and polonius (well, in progress). Additionally, there is the "lexical region resolver", which (roughly) solves the constraints generated through HIR typeck. It is not a full borrow checker, but does emit some errors.

The AST borrowck was the original implementation of the borrow checker and was part of the initially stabilized Rust 1.0. In mid 2017, work began to implement the current MIR borrow checker and that effort ompleted by the end of 2017, for the most part. During 2018, efforts were made to migrate away from the AST borrow checker to the MIR borrow checker - eventually culminating into "migrate" mode - where HIR typeck with lexical region resolving following by MIR borrow checking - being active by default in the 2018 edition.

In early 2019, migrate mode was turned on by default in the 2015 edition as well, but with MIR borrowck errors emitted as warnings. By late 2019, these warnings were upgraded to full errors. This was followed by the complete removal of the AST borrow checker.

In the period since, various errors emitted by the MIR borrow checker have been improved to the point that they are mostly the same or better than those emitted by the lexical region resolver.

While there do remain some degradations in errors (tracked under the [NLL-diagnostics tag](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-diagnostics), those are sufficiently small and rare enough that increased flexibility of MIR borrow check-only is now a worthwhile tradeoff.

## What is stabilized

As said previously, this does not fundamentally change the landscape of accepted programs. However, there are a [few](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-fixed-by-NLL) cases where programs can compile under `feature(nll)`, but not otherwise.

There are two notable patterns that are "fixed" by this stabilization. First, the `scoped_threads` feature, which is a continutation of a pre-1.0 API, can sometimes emit a [weird lifetime error](rust-lang#95527) without NLL. Second, actually seen in the standard library. In the `Extend` impl for `HashMap`, there is an implied bound of `K: 'a` that is available with NLL on but not without - this is utilized in the impl.

As mentioned before, there are a large number of diagnostic differences. Most of them are better, but some are worse. None are serious or happen often enough to need to block this PR. The biggest change is the loss of error code for a number of lifetime errors in favor of more general "lifetime may not live long enough" error. While this may *seem* bad, the former error codes were just attempts to somewhat-arbitrarily bin together lifetime errors of the same type; however, on paper, they end up being roughly the same with roughly the same kinds of solutions.

## What isn't stabilized

This PR does not completely remove the lexical region resolver. In the future, it may be possible to remove that (while still keeping HIR typeck) or to remove it together with HIR typeck.

## Tests

Many test outputs get updated by this PR. However, there are number of tests specifically geared towards NLL under `src/test/ui/nll`

## History

* On 2017-07-14, [tracking issue opened](rust-lang#43234)
* On 2017-07-20, [initial empty MIR pass added](rust-lang#43271)
* On 2017-08-29, [RFC opened](rust-lang/rfcs#2094)
* On 2017-11-16, [Integrate MIR type-checker with NLL](rust-lang#45825)
* On 2017-12-20, [NLL feature complete](rust-lang#46862)
* On 2018-07-07, [Don't run AST borrowck on mir mode](rust-lang#52083)
* On 2018-07-27, [Add migrate mode](rust-lang#52681)
* On 2019-04-22, [Enable migrate mode on 2015 edition](rust-lang#59114)
* On 2019-08-26, [Don't downgrade errors on 2015 edition](rust-lang#64221)
* On 2019-08-27, [Remove AST borrowck](rust-lang#64790)
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2022
Remove migrate borrowck mode

Closes #58781
Closes #43234

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(nll)]` and the removal of `-Z borrowck`. Current borrow checking behavior of item bodies is currently done by first infering regions *lexically* and reporting any errors during HIR type checking. If there *are* any errors, then MIR borrowck (NLL) never occurs. If there *aren't* any errors, then MIR borrowck happens and any errors there would be reported. This PR removes the lexical region check of item bodies entirely and only uses MIR borrowck. Because MIR borrowck could never *not* be run for a compiled program, this should not break any programs. It does, however, change diagnostics significantly and allows a slightly larger set of programs to compile.

Tracking issue: #43234
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2094-nll.md
Version: 1.63 (2022-06-30 => beta, 2022-08-11 => stable).

## Motivation

Over time, the Rust borrow checker has become "smarter" and thus allowed more programs to compile. There have been three different implementations: AST borrowck, MIR borrowck, and polonius (well, in progress). Additionally, there is the "lexical region resolver", which (roughly) solves the constraints generated through HIR typeck. It is not a full borrow checker, but does emit some errors.

The AST borrowck was the original implementation of the borrow checker and was part of the initially stabilized Rust 1.0. In mid 2017, work began to implement the current MIR borrow checker and that effort ompleted by the end of 2017, for the most part. During 2018, efforts were made to migrate away from the AST borrow checker to the MIR borrow checker - eventually culminating into "migrate" mode - where HIR typeck with lexical region resolving following by MIR borrow checking - being active by default in the 2018 edition.

In early 2019, migrate mode was turned on by default in the 2015 edition as well, but with MIR borrowck errors emitted as warnings. By late 2019, these warnings were upgraded to full errors. This was followed by the complete removal of the AST borrow checker.

In the period since, various errors emitted by the MIR borrow checker have been improved to the point that they are mostly the same or better than those emitted by the lexical region resolver.

While there do remain some degradations in errors (tracked under the [NLL-diagnostics tag](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-diagnostics), those are sufficiently small and rare enough that increased flexibility of MIR borrow check-only is now a worthwhile tradeoff.

## What is stabilized

As said previously, this does not fundamentally change the landscape of accepted programs. However, there are a [few](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-fixed-by-NLL) cases where programs can compile under `feature(nll)`, but not otherwise.

There are two notable patterns that are "fixed" by this stabilization. First, the `scoped_threads` feature, which is a continutation of a pre-1.0 API, can sometimes emit a [weird lifetime error](rust-lang/rust#95527) without NLL. Second, actually seen in the standard library. In the `Extend` impl for `HashMap`, there is an implied bound of `K: 'a` that is available with NLL on but not without - this is utilized in the impl.

As mentioned before, there are a large number of diagnostic differences. Most of them are better, but some are worse. None are serious or happen often enough to need to block this PR. The biggest change is the loss of error code for a number of lifetime errors in favor of more general "lifetime may not live long enough" error. While this may *seem* bad, the former error codes were just attempts to somewhat-arbitrarily bin together lifetime errors of the same type; however, on paper, they end up being roughly the same with roughly the same kinds of solutions.

## What isn't stabilized

This PR does not completely remove the lexical region resolver. In the future, it may be possible to remove that (while still keeping HIR typeck) or to remove it together with HIR typeck.

## Tests

Many test outputs get updated by this PR. However, there are number of tests specifically geared towards NLL under `src/test/ui/nll`

## History

* On 2017-07-14, [tracking issue opened](rust-lang/rust#43234)
* On 2017-07-20, [initial empty MIR pass added](rust-lang/rust#43271)
* On 2017-08-29, [RFC opened](rust-lang/rfcs#2094)
* On 2017-11-16, [Integrate MIR type-checker with NLL](rust-lang/rust#45825)
* On 2017-12-20, [NLL feature complete](rust-lang/rust#46862)
* On 2018-07-07, [Don't run AST borrowck on mir mode](rust-lang/rust#52083)
* On 2018-07-27, [Add migrate mode](rust-lang/rust#52681)
* On 2019-04-22, [Enable migrate mode on 2015 edition](rust-lang/rust#59114)
* On 2019-08-26, [Don't downgrade errors on 2015 edition](rust-lang/rust#64221)
* On 2019-08-27, [Remove AST borrowck](rust-lang/rust#64790)
workingjubilee pushed a commit to tcdi/postgrestd that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2022
Remove migrate borrowck mode

Closes #58781
Closes #43234

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(nll)]` and the removal of `-Z borrowck`. Current borrow checking behavior of item bodies is currently done by first infering regions *lexically* and reporting any errors during HIR type checking. If there *are* any errors, then MIR borrowck (NLL) never occurs. If there *aren't* any errors, then MIR borrowck happens and any errors there would be reported. This PR removes the lexical region check of item bodies entirely and only uses MIR borrowck. Because MIR borrowck could never *not* be run for a compiled program, this should not break any programs. It does, however, change diagnostics significantly and allows a slightly larger set of programs to compile.

Tracking issue: #43234
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2094-nll.md
Version: 1.63 (2022-06-30 => beta, 2022-08-11 => stable).

## Motivation

Over time, the Rust borrow checker has become "smarter" and thus allowed more programs to compile. There have been three different implementations: AST borrowck, MIR borrowck, and polonius (well, in progress). Additionally, there is the "lexical region resolver", which (roughly) solves the constraints generated through HIR typeck. It is not a full borrow checker, but does emit some errors.

The AST borrowck was the original implementation of the borrow checker and was part of the initially stabilized Rust 1.0. In mid 2017, work began to implement the current MIR borrow checker and that effort ompleted by the end of 2017, for the most part. During 2018, efforts were made to migrate away from the AST borrow checker to the MIR borrow checker - eventually culminating into "migrate" mode - where HIR typeck with lexical region resolving following by MIR borrow checking - being active by default in the 2018 edition.

In early 2019, migrate mode was turned on by default in the 2015 edition as well, but with MIR borrowck errors emitted as warnings. By late 2019, these warnings were upgraded to full errors. This was followed by the complete removal of the AST borrow checker.

In the period since, various errors emitted by the MIR borrow checker have been improved to the point that they are mostly the same or better than those emitted by the lexical region resolver.

While there do remain some degradations in errors (tracked under the [NLL-diagnostics tag](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-diagnostics), those are sufficiently small and rare enough that increased flexibility of MIR borrow check-only is now a worthwhile tradeoff.

## What is stabilized

As said previously, this does not fundamentally change the landscape of accepted programs. However, there are a [few](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-fixed-by-NLL) cases where programs can compile under `feature(nll)`, but not otherwise.

There are two notable patterns that are "fixed" by this stabilization. First, the `scoped_threads` feature, which is a continutation of a pre-1.0 API, can sometimes emit a [weird lifetime error](rust-lang/rust#95527) without NLL. Second, actually seen in the standard library. In the `Extend` impl for `HashMap`, there is an implied bound of `K: 'a` that is available with NLL on but not without - this is utilized in the impl.

As mentioned before, there are a large number of diagnostic differences. Most of them are better, but some are worse. None are serious or happen often enough to need to block this PR. The biggest change is the loss of error code for a number of lifetime errors in favor of more general "lifetime may not live long enough" error. While this may *seem* bad, the former error codes were just attempts to somewhat-arbitrarily bin together lifetime errors of the same type; however, on paper, they end up being roughly the same with roughly the same kinds of solutions.

## What isn't stabilized

This PR does not completely remove the lexical region resolver. In the future, it may be possible to remove that (while still keeping HIR typeck) or to remove it together with HIR typeck.

## Tests

Many test outputs get updated by this PR. However, there are number of tests specifically geared towards NLL under `src/test/ui/nll`

## History

* On 2017-07-14, [tracking issue opened](rust-lang/rust#43234)
* On 2017-07-20, [initial empty MIR pass added](rust-lang/rust#43271)
* On 2017-08-29, [RFC opened](rust-lang/rfcs#2094)
* On 2017-11-16, [Integrate MIR type-checker with NLL](rust-lang/rust#45825)
* On 2017-12-20, [NLL feature complete](rust-lang/rust#46862)
* On 2018-07-07, [Don't run AST borrowck on mir mode](rust-lang/rust#52083)
* On 2018-07-27, [Add migrate mode](rust-lang/rust#52681)
* On 2019-04-22, [Enable migrate mode on 2015 edition](rust-lang/rust#59114)
* On 2019-08-26, [Don't downgrade errors on 2015 edition](rust-lang/rust#64221)
* On 2019-08-27, [Remove AST borrowck](rust-lang/rust#64790)
spikespaz pushed a commit to spikespaz/dotwalk-rs that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Remove migrate borrowck mode

Closes #58781
Closes #43234

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(nll)]` and the removal of `-Z borrowck`. Current borrow checking behavior of item bodies is currently done by first infering regions *lexically* and reporting any errors during HIR type checking. If there *are* any errors, then MIR borrowck (NLL) never occurs. If there *aren't* any errors, then MIR borrowck happens and any errors there would be reported. This PR removes the lexical region check of item bodies entirely and only uses MIR borrowck. Because MIR borrowck could never *not* be run for a compiled program, this should not break any programs. It does, however, change diagnostics significantly and allows a slightly larger set of programs to compile.

Tracking issue: #43234
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2094-nll.md
Version: 1.63 (2022-06-30 => beta, 2022-08-11 => stable).

## Motivation

Over time, the Rust borrow checker has become "smarter" and thus allowed more programs to compile. There have been three different implementations: AST borrowck, MIR borrowck, and polonius (well, in progress). Additionally, there is the "lexical region resolver", which (roughly) solves the constraints generated through HIR typeck. It is not a full borrow checker, but does emit some errors.

The AST borrowck was the original implementation of the borrow checker and was part of the initially stabilized Rust 1.0. In mid 2017, work began to implement the current MIR borrow checker and that effort ompleted by the end of 2017, for the most part. During 2018, efforts were made to migrate away from the AST borrow checker to the MIR borrow checker - eventually culminating into "migrate" mode - where HIR typeck with lexical region resolving following by MIR borrow checking - being active by default in the 2018 edition.

In early 2019, migrate mode was turned on by default in the 2015 edition as well, but with MIR borrowck errors emitted as warnings. By late 2019, these warnings were upgraded to full errors. This was followed by the complete removal of the AST borrow checker.

In the period since, various errors emitted by the MIR borrow checker have been improved to the point that they are mostly the same or better than those emitted by the lexical region resolver.

While there do remain some degradations in errors (tracked under the [NLL-diagnostics tag](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-diagnostics), those are sufficiently small and rare enough that increased flexibility of MIR borrow check-only is now a worthwhile tradeoff.

## What is stabilized

As said previously, this does not fundamentally change the landscape of accepted programs. However, there are a [few](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-fixed-by-NLL) cases where programs can compile under `feature(nll)`, but not otherwise.

There are two notable patterns that are "fixed" by this stabilization. First, the `scoped_threads` feature, which is a continutation of a pre-1.0 API, can sometimes emit a [weird lifetime error](rust-lang/rust#95527) without NLL. Second, actually seen in the standard library. In the `Extend` impl for `HashMap`, there is an implied bound of `K: 'a` that is available with NLL on but not without - this is utilized in the impl.

As mentioned before, there are a large number of diagnostic differences. Most of them are better, but some are worse. None are serious or happen often enough to need to block this PR. The biggest change is the loss of error code for a number of lifetime errors in favor of more general "lifetime may not live long enough" error. While this may *seem* bad, the former error codes were just attempts to somewhat-arbitrarily bin together lifetime errors of the same type; however, on paper, they end up being roughly the same with roughly the same kinds of solutions.

## What isn't stabilized

This PR does not completely remove the lexical region resolver. In the future, it may be possible to remove that (while still keeping HIR typeck) or to remove it together with HIR typeck.

## Tests

Many test outputs get updated by this PR. However, there are number of tests specifically geared towards NLL under `src/test/ui/nll`

## History

* On 2017-07-14, [tracking issue opened](rust-lang/rust#43234)
* On 2017-07-20, [initial empty MIR pass added](rust-lang/rust#43271)
* On 2017-08-29, [RFC opened](rust-lang/rfcs#2094)
* On 2017-11-16, [Integrate MIR type-checker with NLL](rust-lang/rust#45825)
* On 2017-12-20, [NLL feature complete](rust-lang/rust#46862)
* On 2018-07-07, [Don't run AST borrowck on mir mode](rust-lang/rust#52083)
* On 2018-07-27, [Add migrate mode](rust-lang/rust#52681)
* On 2019-04-22, [Enable migrate mode on 2015 edition](rust-lang/rust#59114)
* On 2019-08-26, [Don't downgrade errors on 2015 edition](rust-lang/rust#64221)
* On 2019-08-27, [Remove AST borrowck](rust-lang/rust#64790)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants