Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't ICE with nested enums in missing docs lint. #42262

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2017

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented May 27, 2017

Fixes #40350.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 27, 2017
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

This also simplifies the lint by not storing variant depth or the struct
def stack, because we no longer need them.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@eddyb I believe I updated code per our discussion in IRC.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented May 28, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 28, 2017

📌 Commit 918875f has been approved by eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 29, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 918875f with merge be5f4fe...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2017
Don't ICE with nested enums in missing docs lint.

Fixes #40350.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 29, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: eddyb
Pushing be5f4fe to master...

@bors bors merged commit 918875f into rust-lang:master May 29, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the issue-40350 branch June 8, 2019 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants