Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expanded docs and examples for PathBuf::file_name and friends #41376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2017

Conversation

mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor

This addresses some common surprises when PathBuf::set_file_name is called on the path of a directory rather than a file.

r? @steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

thank you!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 18, 2017

📌 Commit 652589f has been approved by steveklabnik

@mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops, fixed a misplaced paren in a doc test.

@aidanhs aidanhs added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 19, 2017
@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

📌 Commit c129312 has been approved by frewsxcv

@frewsxcv frewsxcv added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 19, 2017
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2017
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #41295, #41348, #41374, #41380, #41391, #41398, #41403
- Failed merges: #41376
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #41411) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2017

🔒 Merge conflict

@mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased and integrated with the changes from #41348.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2017

📌 Commit 3b4d34d has been approved by frewsxcv

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2017
Expanded docs and examples for PathBuf::file_name and friends

This addresses some common surprises when `PathBuf::set_file_name` is called on the path of a directory rather than a file.

r? @steveklabnik
TimNN added a commit to TimNN/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Expanded docs and examples for PathBuf::file_name and friends

This addresses some common surprises when `PathBuf::set_file_name` is called on the path of a directory rather than a file.

r? @steveklabnik
TimNN added a commit to TimNN/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Expanded docs and examples for PathBuf::file_name and friends

This addresses some common surprises when `PathBuf::set_file_name` is called on the path of a directory rather than a file.

r? @steveklabnik
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Expanded docs and examples for PathBuf::file_name and friends

This addresses some common surprises when `PathBuf::set_file_name` is called on the path of a directory rather than a file.

r? @steveklabnik
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Expanded docs and examples for PathBuf::file_name and friends

This addresses some common surprises when `PathBuf::set_file_name` is called on the path of a directory rather than a file.

r? @steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2017
Rollup of 4 pull requests

- Successful merges: #41372, #41376, #41426, #41429
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 3b4d34d into rust-lang:master Apr 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants