Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow using Vec::<T>::place_back for T: !Clone #40909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2017

Conversation

nagisa
Copy link
Member

@nagisa nagisa commented Mar 29, 2017

The place_back was likely put into block with T: Clone bound by mistake.

The place_back was likely put into block with `T: Clone` bound by mistake.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@apasel422
Copy link
Contributor

My bad!

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2017

📌 Commit 1e3bc5a has been approved by sfackler

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 1e3bc5a with merge 47cd926...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2017

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

  • This pull request previously failed. You should add more commits to fix the bug, or use retry to trigger a build again.
  • There's another pull request that is currently being tested, blocking this pull request: change the strategy for diverging types #40224

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2017

📌 Commit 1e3bc5a has been approved by alexcrichton

@nagisa
Copy link
Member Author

nagisa commented Apr 1, 2017

This PR is still reflected as failed on the queue, despite the approval or the retry.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 1e3bc5a with merge 495862b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@bluss
Copy link
Member

bluss commented Apr 3, 2017

The constraints per impl block are a vestige of older Rust anyway, it should be cleaned up (a single impl block for the inherent methods).

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

alexcrichton commented Apr 3, 2017 via email

arielb1 pushed a commit to arielb1/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2017
…chton

Allow using Vec::<T>::place_back for T: !Clone

The place_back was likely put into block with `T: Clone` bound by mistake.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
Rollup of 12 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40479, #40561, #40709, #40815, #40909, #40927, #40943, #41015, #41028, #41052, #41054, #41065
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 1e3bc5a into rust-lang:master Apr 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants