-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert #39485, fixing type-inference regressions #40636
Conversation
Note: I haven't had time to fully test this. =) Gotta run, but I've got a build going and will check back in. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit f2150ae has been approved by |
🔒 Merge conflict |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40693) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
f2150ae
to
0f1eb8a
Compare
@bors r=eddyb |
📌 Commit 0f1eb8a has been approved by |
Marking as beta-accepted. Small patch, minimal risk, regression. cc @rust-lang/compiler |
Revert rust-lang#39485, fixing type-inference regressions This reverts PR rust-lang#39485, which should fix the immediate regressions. Eventually I'd like to land rust-lang#40224 -- or some variant of it -- which revisits the question fo dead-code and inference. r? @eddyb cc @canndrew
Revert rust-lang#39485, fixing type-inference regressions This reverts PR rust-lang#39485, which should fix the immediate regressions. Eventually I'd like to land rust-lang#40224 -- or some variant of it -- which revisits the question fo dead-code and inference. r? @eddyb cc @canndrew
…chton Backport #40636 to beta I suspect that this will help with #40953 but have not been able to verify for...reasons. r? @alexcrichton cc @brson
This reverts PR #39485, which should fix the immediate regressions. Eventually I'd like to land #40224 -- or some variant of it -- which revisits the question fo dead-code and inference.
r? @eddyb
cc @canndrew