-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed objects files extension to "obj" on windows #38876
Closed
liranringel
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:master
from
liranringel:bugfix/obj-for-windows-producing-o-instead-of-obj
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this not trigger a dead code warning for one of the two arms depending on
target_os
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't feel right, I'd expect to use the target OS not the host one (of the rustc in use).
That is, this won't use
.obj
for cross-compilation and that seems wrong to me.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rkruppe I made a simple program that checks that. It didn't trigger a dead code warning.
@eddyb I agree. I'll see how it can be done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd liked to pass
Session
and use thesess.target.target.options.target_family
, butSession
is notSync
, and It cannot be sent inrun_work_multithreaded
.I wonder how should I pass that information (because it will has to be sent to many functions, so I want it to be part of something like
WorkItem
orCodegenContext
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You may be able to clone
TargetOptions
(or whatever the type is called)? That or pre-compute the file names. cc @rust-lang/compilerThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eddyb Oh, it could be part of
TargetOptions
. Is there a reason thatObject
is part ofOutputType
, andTargetOptions
(which hasexe_suffix
,staticlib_suffix
...) does not simply haveobj_suffix
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so? Those suffixes seem like the natural place for this though.