Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace Not example with something more evocative #35827

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2016

Conversation

matthew-piziak
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@matthew-piziak
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @steveklabnik

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned steveklabnik and unassigned brson Aug 19, 2016
@matthew-piziak matthew-piziak changed the title replace Neg example with something more evocative of negation replace Not example with something more evocative Aug 19, 2016
@mrhota
Copy link
Contributor

mrhota commented Aug 19, 2016

looks good; very helpful

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 19, 2016

📌 Commit 06147ac has been approved by steveklabnik

sophiajt pushed a commit to sophiajt/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2016
…klabnik

replace `Not` example with something more evocative
sophiajt pushed a commit to sophiajt/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2016
…klabnik

replace `Not` example with something more evocative
sophiajt pushed a commit to sophiajt/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2016
…klabnik

replace `Not` example with something more evocative
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 06147ac into rust-lang:master Aug 20, 2016
@matthew-piziak matthew-piziak deleted the neg-example branch August 23, 2016 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants