Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More defailbloating #16100

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

More defailbloating #16100

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Jul 30, 2014

With this, all the failure lang item calls, and all begin_unwind (fail!) calls are optimized to take either one or two pointers, at least one of which is a constant, with the exception that the bounds check lang item also takes index and len. Code gen for all that is gorgeous.

Divide-by-zero before:

        leaq    "str\"str\"(1762)"(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, 16(%rsp)
        movq    $27, 24(%rsp)
        leaq    "str\"str\"(1542)"(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, (%rsp)
        movq    $19, 8(%rsp)
        leaq    16(%rsp), %rdi
        leaq    (%rsp), %rsi
        movl    $32, %edx
        callq   _ZN7failure5fail_20hc04408f955ce60aaqWjE@PLT

After:

        leaq    .Lconst(%rip), %rdi
        callq   _ZN7failure5fail_20haf918a97c8f7f2bfqWjE@PLT

Bounds check before:

        leaq    "str\"str\"(1542)"(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, 8(%rsp)
        movq    $19, 16(%rsp)
        leaq    8(%rsp), %rdi
        movl    $38, %esi
        movl    $1, %edx
        movl    $1, %ecx
        callq   _ZN7failure17fail_bounds_check20hf4bc3c69e96caf41RXjE@PLT

Bounds check after:

        leaq    .Lconst2(%rip), %rdi
        movl    $1, %esi
        movl    $1, %edx
        callq   _ZN7failure17fail_bounds_check20h5267276a537a7de22XjE@PLT

Size before:

21277995 librustc-4e7c5e5c.s

text       data
12554881   6089335

Size after:

21247617 librustc-4e7c5e5c.so

text       data
12518497   6095748

The next two steps might be to change the amount of information we generate based on a compiler flag, and maybe debug levels; and to investigate improving codegen for fmt::Arguments, which appears in many fail! invocations.

r? @pcwalton

brson added 4 commits July 29, 2014 23:23
Divide-by-zero before:

```
        leaq    "str\"str\"(1762)"(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, 16(%rsp)
        movq    $27, 24(%rsp)
        leaq    "str\"str\"(1542)"(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, (%rsp)
        movq    $19, 8(%rsp)
        leaq    16(%rsp), %rdi
        leaq    (%rsp), %rsi
        movl    $32, %edx
        callq   _ZN7failure5fail_20hc04408f955ce60aaqWjE@PLT
```

After:

```
        leaq    .Lconst(%rip), %rdi
        callq   _ZN7failure5fail_20haf918a97c8f7f2bfqWjE@PLT
```

Bounds check before:

```
        leaq    "str\"str\"(1542)"(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, 8(%rsp)
        movq    $19, 16(%rsp)
        leaq    8(%rsp), %rdi
        movl    $38, %esi
        movl    $1, %edx
        movl    $1, %ecx
        callq   _ZN7failure17fail_bounds_check20hf4bc3c69e96caf41RXjE@PLT
```

Bounds check after:

```
        leaq    .Lconst2(%rip), %rdi
        movl    $1, %esi
        movl    $1, %edx
        callq   _ZN7failure17fail_bounds_check20h5267276a537a7de22XjE@PLT
```

Size before:

21277995 librustc-4e7c5e5c.s

```
text       data
12554881   6089335
```

Size after:

21247617 librustc-4e7c5e5c.so

```
text       data
12518497   6095748
```
For consistency, just because `fail_` has it.
@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jul 30, 2014

Note that this time the total rustc binary size actually shrank! That doesn't seem to be true of every binary though.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

🍠

lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
…ykril

feat: add assoc func quickfix for `unresolved_method` diagnostic

![demo](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/71162630/1ea1d8b8-3436-4251-a512-e0f9de01a13c)

close rust-lang/rust-analyzer#13247

EDIT: I think add a demo gif would be helpful to `@lnicola` when he make a release change log :)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants