Skip to content

Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types #144797

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2025

Conversation

nilehmann
Copy link
Contributor

Change the safety comment on new_unchecked to mention the valid range instead of 0. I noticed this while working on https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 1, 2025

r? @jhpratt

rustbot has assigned @jhpratt.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

looks good, thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2025

📌 Commit 4c7c9de has been approved by Noratrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 1, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
…Noratrieb

Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types

Change the safety comment on `new_unchecked` to mention the valid range instead of 0. I noticed this while working on https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std
@Urgau Urgau added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 1, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)
 - #135771 ([rustdoc] Add support for associated items in "jump to def" feature)
 - #143360 (loop match: error on `#[const_continue]` outside `#[loop_match]`)
 - #143662 ([rustdoc] Display unsafe attrs with edition 2024 `unsafe()` wrappers.)
 - #144478 (Improve formatting of doc code blocks)
 - #144703 ([test][AIX] ignore extern_weak linkage test)
 - #144747 (compiletest: Improve diagnostics for line annotation mismatches 2)
 - #144766 (Add human readable name "Cygwin")
 - #144782 (Properly pass path to staged `rustc` to `compiletest` self-tests)
 - #144786 (Cleanup the definition of `group_type`)
 - #144796 (Add my previous commit name to .mailmap)
 - #144797 (Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
samueltardieu added a commit to samueltardieu/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2025
…Noratrieb

Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types

Change the safety comment on `new_unchecked` to mention the valid range instead of 0. I noticed this while working on https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2025
Rollup of 18 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)
 - #135771 ([rustdoc] Add support for associated items in "jump to def" feature)
 - #143360 (loop match: error on `#[const_continue]` outside `#[loop_match]`)
 - #143662 ([rustdoc] Display unsafe attrs with edition 2024 `unsafe()` wrappers.)
 - #143771 (Constify some more `Result` functions)
 - #143900 ([rustdoc] Correctly handle `should_panic` doctest attribute and fix `--no-run` test flag on the 2024 edition)
 - #144185 (Document guarantees of poisoning)
 - #144395 (update fortanix tests)
 - #144478 (Improve formatting of doc code blocks)
 - #144614 (Fortify RemoveUnneededDrops test.)
 - #144703 ([test][AIX] ignore extern_weak linkage test)
 - #144747 (compiletest: Improve diagnostics for line annotation mismatches 2)
 - #144756 (detect infinite recursion with tail calls in ctfe)
 - #144766 (Add human readable name "Cygwin")
 - #144782 (Properly pass path to staged `rustc` to `compiletest` self-tests)
 - #144786 (Cleanup the definition of `group_type`)
 - #144796 (Add my previous commit name to .mailmap)
 - #144797 (Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types)

Failed merges:

 - #144805 (compiletest: Preliminary cleanup of `ProcRes` printing/unwinding)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2025
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)
 - #143360 (loop match: error on `#[const_continue]` outside `#[loop_match]`)
 - #143662 ([rustdoc] Display unsafe attrs with edition 2024 `unsafe()` wrappers.)
 - #143771 (Constify some more `Result` functions)
 - #144185 (Document guarantees of poisoning)
 - #144395 (update fortanix tests)
 - #144478 (Improve formatting of doc code blocks)
 - #144614 (Fortify RemoveUnneededDrops test.)
 - #144703 ([test][AIX] ignore extern_weak linkage test)
 - #144747 (compiletest: Improve diagnostics for line annotation mismatches 2)
 - #144756 (detect infinite recursion with tail calls in ctfe)
 - #144766 (Add human readable name "Cygwin")
 - #144782 (Properly pass path to staged `rustc` to `compiletest` self-tests)
 - #144786 (Cleanup the definition of `group_type`)
 - #144796 (Add my previous commit name to .mailmap)
 - #144797 (Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types)
 - #144803 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5e1ea9c into rust-lang:master Aug 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Aug 3, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2025
Rollup merge of #144797 - nilehmann:safety-comment-niche, r=Noratrieb

Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types

Change the safety comment on `new_unchecked` to mention the valid range instead of 0. I noticed this while working on https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2025
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)
 - rust-lang/rust#143360 (loop match: error on `#[const_continue]` outside `#[loop_match]`)
 - rust-lang/rust#143662 ([rustdoc] Display unsafe attrs with edition 2024 `unsafe()` wrappers.)
 - rust-lang/rust#143771 (Constify some more `Result` functions)
 - rust-lang/rust#144185 (Document guarantees of poisoning)
 - rust-lang/rust#144395 (update fortanix tests)
 - rust-lang/rust#144478 (Improve formatting of doc code blocks)
 - rust-lang/rust#144614 (Fortify RemoveUnneededDrops test.)
 - rust-lang/rust#144703 ([test][AIX] ignore extern_weak linkage test)
 - rust-lang/rust#144747 (compiletest: Improve diagnostics for line annotation mismatches 2)
 - rust-lang/rust#144756 (detect infinite recursion with tail calls in ctfe)
 - rust-lang/rust#144766 (Add human readable name "Cygwin")
 - rust-lang/rust#144782 (Properly pass path to staged `rustc` to `compiletest` self-tests)
 - rust-lang/rust#144786 (Cleanup the definition of `group_type`)
 - rust-lang/rust#144796 (Add my previous commit name to .mailmap)
 - rust-lang/rust#144797 (Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types)
 - rust-lang/rust#144803 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2025
…Noratrieb

Update safety comment for new_unchecked in niche_types

Change the safety comment on `new_unchecked` to mention the valid range instead of 0. I noticed this while working on https://github.com/model-checking/verify-rust-std
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants