Rollup of 7 pull requests #136070
Merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests #136070
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Simplify some of the language - Minor grammar fixes - Don't imply that pipes *only* work across multiple processes; instead, *suggest* that they're typically used across two or more separate processes. - Specify that portable applications cannot use multiple readers or multiple writers for messages larger than a byte, due to potential interleaving. - Remove no-longer-referenced footnote URLs.
…yukang remove long-deprecated no-op attributes no_start and crate_id These have emitted a deprecation warning since forever (rust-lang#64471) and they already don't do anything. In fact they [apparently](rust-lang#64471 (comment)) have done nothing since pre-1.0, so... do we even need a crater run? Doesn't seem worth it.
Improve and expand documentation of pipes - Reference UNIX, not just Linux - Simplify some of the language - Don't imply that pipes *only* work across multiple processes; instead, *suggest* that they're typically used across two or more separate processes. - Specify that portable applications cannot use multiple readers or multiple writers for messages larger than a byte, due to potential interleaving. Tracking issue for anonymous pipes: rust-lang#127154
…-Simulacrum Include missing item in the 1.81 release notes It was pointed out to me that when I prepared the CVE-2024-43402 fix in the stable branch, I added the release notes in the stable PR (rust-lang#129960), but I forgot to do so in the beta or nightly PR. Because of that, the relnotes line only appeared in 1.81, and disappeared afterwards.
ports last few library files to new intrinsic style This pr ports the last 2 library files to new intrinsic style this pr is part of issue rust-lang#132735
… r=jieyouxu Improve check-cfg expected names diagnostic This PR improves the check-cfg `allow-same-level` test by ~~normalizing it's output and by~~ adding more context to the test. It also filters the well known cfgs from the `expected names are` note, as to reduce the size of the diagnostic. Users can still find the full list on the [rustc book](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg.html#well-known-names-and-values), which is reinforced for Cargo users by adding a note in the Cargo check-cfg specific section. Fixes rust-lang#135995 r? `@jieyouxu`
docs: fix typo in std::pin overview Unimportant fix in `std::pin` documentation.
…t, r=jieyouxu Fix typo in const stability error message
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 6fb03584cf In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced Jan 26, 2025
|
Finished benchmarking commit (2f0ad2a): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 0.8%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary -3.2%, secondary 13.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 771.759s -> 773.228s (0.19%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup