-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #133948
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #133948
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix missing newlines that rustfmt removed. fix trailing whitespace Fix duplicate word. Reformat panic reasons into a list remove trailing whitespace 2 electric boogaloo Change verbe tense. Integrate suggestions
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
… r=workingjubilee rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (rust-lang#116973) Command line flag `-Zreg-struct-return` for X86 (32-bit) for rust-for-linux. This flag enables the same behavior as the `abi_return_struct_as_int` target spec key. - Tracking issue: rust-lang#116973
…-ffi, r=RalfJung Extend Miri to correctly pass mutable pointers through FFI Based off of rust-lang#129684, this PR further extends Miri to execute native calls that make use of pointers to *mutable* memory. We adapt Miri's bookkeeping of internal state upon any FFI call that gives external code permission to mutate memory. Native code may now possibly write and therefore initialize and change the pointer provenance of bytes it has access to: Such memory is assumed to be *initialized* afterwards and bytes are given *arbitrary (wildcard) provenance*. This enables programs that correctly use mutating FFI calls to run Miri without errors, at the cost of possibly missing Undefined Behaviour caused by incorrect usage of mutating FFI. > <details> > > <summary> Simple example </summary> > > ```rust > extern "C" { > fn init_int(ptr: *mut i32); > } > > fn main() { > let mut x = std::mem::MaybeUninit::<i32>::uninit(); > let x = unsafe { > init_int(x.as_mut_ptr()); > x.assume_init() > }; > > println!("C initialized my memory to: {x}"); > } > ``` > ```c > void init_int(int *ptr) { > *ptr = 42; > } > ``` > should now show `C initialized my memory to: 42`. > > </details> r? `@RalfJung`
crashes: more tests r? `@jieyouxu`
…ondi,workingjubilee Improve documentation for Vec::extend_from_within This closes rust-lang#104762. It rephrases some of the explanations, and greatly improves the clarity of the example. Based on this PR and its discussions: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105030/files#r1059808792
…=ehuss rustbook: update to use new mdbook-trpl package from The Book Updates to the latest merge from `rust-lang/book` and simplifies the dependency chain there. There are now three preprocessors, but only one package, so everything is a lot nicer to deal with from the consuming POV (i.e. here).
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Dec 6, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Dec 6, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130777 (rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (rust-lang#116973)) - rust-lang#133211 (Extend Miri to correctly pass mutable pointers through FFI) - rust-lang#133294 (crashes: more tests) - rust-lang#133790 (Improve documentation for Vec::extend_from_within) - rust-lang#133930 (rustbook: update to use new mdbook-trpl package from The Book) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Dec 6, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
-Zreg-struct-return
support inrustc
#116973))r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup