Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rustdoc] Fix handling of footnote reference in footnote definition #133040

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Fixes #131946.

We didn't check if we had footnote reference in footnote definition.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 14, 2024
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 14, 2024

📌 Commit 052d40a has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 14, 2024
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

thank you Guillaume, my power is no longer constrained!

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128197 (Skip locking span interner for some syntax context checks)
 - rust-lang#133040 ([rustdoc] Fix handling of footnote reference in footnote definition)
 - rust-lang#133043 (rustdoc-search: case-sensitive only when capitals are used)
 - rust-lang#133046 (Clippy subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

A bit less for sure. Don't let code constrain you! 🐱

@bors bors merged commit dd61213 into rust-lang:master Nov 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Nov 15, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133040 - GuillaumeGomez:footnote-ref-in-def, r=notriddle

[rustdoc] Fix handling of footnote reference in footnote definition

Fixes rust-lang#131946.

We didn't check if we had footnote reference in footnote definition.

r? `@notriddle`
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the footnote-ref-in-def branch November 15, 2024 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustdoc: recursive footnote not rendered correctly
5 participants