Rollup of 8 pull requests #131628
Merged
Rollup of 8 pull requests #131628
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This check was previously only performed on functions not function pointers. Co-authored-by: Folkert <folkert@folkertdev.nl>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
These are common pitfalls for beginners, so I think it's worth making the subtleties more visible.
…eatures Add missing error annotations and .stderr file Acknowledge comments
…iler-errors Check ABI target compatibility for function pointers Tracking issue: rust-lang#130260 Related tracking issue: rust-lang#87678 Compatibility of an ABI for a target was previously only performed on function definitions and `extern` blocks. This PR adds it also to function pointers to be consistent. This might have broken some of the `tests/ui/` depending on the platform, so a try run seems like a good idea. Also this might break existing code, because we now emit extra errors. Does this require a crater run? # Example ```rust // build with: --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu // These raise E0570 extern "thiscall" fn foo() {} extern "thiscall" { fn bar() } // This did not raise any error fn baz(f: extern "thiscall" fn()) { f() } ``` # Open Questions * [x] Should this report a future incompatibility warning like rust-lang#87678 ? * [ ] Is this the best place to perform the check?
…c, r=Mark-Simulacrum make `Step` doc-comments more clear Aiming to improve complicated `Step` documentation. Once we merge this, I will update [this page](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/building/bootstrapping/how-bootstrap-does-it.html?highlight=Step#synopsis-of--step) too.
…lcnr Don't assume traits used as type are trait objs in 2021 edition Fixes rust-lang#127548 When you use a trait as a type, the compiler automatically assumes you meant to use a trait object, which is not always the case. This PR fixes the bug where you don't need a trait object, so the error message was changed to: ``` error[E0782]: expected a type, found a trait ``` Also fixes some ICEs: Fixes rust-lang#120241 Fixes rust-lang#120482 Fixes rust-lang#125512
…y-instability-lint-for-clippy, r=xFrednet Handle `clippy` cases of `rustc::potential_query_instability` lint This PR removes `#![allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]` line from [`src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/lib.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/lib.rs#L30) and converts `FxHash{Map,Set}` types into `FxIndex{Map,Set}` to suppress lint errors. A somewhat tracking issue: rust-lang#84447
…=Mark-Simulacrum More clearly document Stdin::read_line These are common pitfalls for beginners, so I think it's worth making the subtleties more visible.
…ccepted-features, r=jieyouxu Emit an error for unstable attributes that reference already stable features Closes rust-lang#129814
Shallowly match opaque key in storage Using a full eq on the key *and* the hidden type means that in cases where we first ambiguously register a `?t` hidden type then constrain that `?t` to be a type that doesn't actually satisfy its bounds, we end up with bogus entries in the opaque type storage. We should commit to the type in the storage if it's registered. r? lcnr
…tgross35 remove const_cow_is_borrowed feature gate The two functions guarded by this are still unstable, and there's no reason to require a separate feature gate for their const-ness -- we can just have `cow_is_borrowed` cover both kinds of stability. Cc rust-lang#65143
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 6b9676b454 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (ef4e825): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 0.5%, secondary 2.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 780.1s -> 781.811s (0.22%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Stepdoc-comments more clear #130965 (makeStepdoc-comments more clear)clippycases ofrustc::potential_query_instabilitylint #131277 (Handleclippycases ofrustc::potential_query_instabilitylint)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup